Swaps data: IM grows in listed and OTC markets
Data shows fourth-quarter jump in IM across all product groups and after-effects of Nasdaq losses
The fourth quarter of 2018 was a time for soul searching at the world’s largest clearing houses, as margin models were called into question in the wake of a €114 million ($127.6 billion) loss at Nasdaq Commodities.
A new set of quantitative disclosures from the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and International Organization of Securities Commissions hint at the extreme energy moves that triggered the losses – perhaps most evident in Ice Futures Europe’s eighteen-fold year-on-year jump in credit exposure to a single participant.
The figures show a clear increase in initial margin backing all major product groups – both over-the-counter and listed derivatives – in the 12 months leading up to the end of December.
Cleared interest rate swaps consumed 9% more IM than a year previously. LCH continued to dominate with $137 billion of interest rate swaps margin – up 16%. But momentum was firmly behind Eurex, where IRS margin jumped by 40% – driven perhaps by Brexit-related transfers. There is no sign of LCH’s crown being taken any time soon though, as the Frankfurt-based clearer had just $5 billion of initial margin backing cleared interest rate swaps.
There are many factors at play. In OTC markets, more players were incentivised to clear their derivatives exposures as phase three implementation of uncleared margin rules kicked in on September 1, bringing smaller dealers and the first buy-side firm into scope for initial margin on bilateral trades. In listed markets, where IM jumped by 13%, surging year-end equity volatility may also have contributed.
When it comes to credit risk, the picture is mixed. The Options Clearing Corporation estimates its largest aggregate stress loss on the default of a single participant at $4.1 billion, slightly down on a year earlier. LCH’s peak stress loss, at $4 billion, jumped 48% compared with a year previously.
Cleared interest rate swaps
Let’s start with the largest over-the-counter product, interest rate swaps and quarterly trends.
Figure 1 shows:
- LCH SwapClear the largest with $137 billion initial margin on December 31, 2018, which is up 16% in sterling terms from a year earlier, an absolute amount of £14.7 billion ($19.2 billion).
- CME IRS is next with $24.7 billion, up 3% from a year earlier.
- JSCC IRS with $6.3 billion, up 6% in yen terms.
- Eurex IRS with $5 billion, up 40% in euro terms.
The cumulative total for these four clearing services is $173 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 9% from the $159 billion a year earlier.
Cleared credit default swaps
Let’s turn next to credit default swaps, both index and single name.
Figure 2 shows:
- Ice Clear Credit the largest with $34.2 billion, up 37% or $9.3 billion from a year earlier.
- Ice Clear Europe is next with $6.9 billion, up 12% in euro terms.
- LCH CDSClear with $3.3 billion, up 42% in euro terms.
- CME CDS is no longer active.
The cumulative total for these three clearing services is $44.4 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 27% from the $35 billion a year earlier.
Futures and options
Next, exchange-traded derivatives, namely futures and options, and see if these markets show similar growth trends in initial margin.
Figure 3 shows:
- CME Base the largest with $100.8 billion, up 18% or $15.7 billion from a year earlier.
- Ice Futures Europe is next with $45.2 billion, up 31% in US dollar terms, the first time its initial margin is higher than Eurex.
- Eurex with $40.1 billion, down 8% in euro terms.
- Ice Futures US with $14.7 billion, up 19%.
- SGX DC with $6.3 billion, up 33%.
- ASX CLF with $3.5 billion, down 14%.
The cumulative total for these six clearing services is $211 billion on December 31, 2018, an increase of 13% from the $187 billion a year earlier.
Cash movements
Next, let’s look at the maximum total variation margin received on a single day in the quarter for selected clearing services.
Figure 4 shows:
- The quarter ending March 31, 2018 remains the largest, with a $31 billion total for these five clearing services, while the most recent quarter total was $25.6 billion.
- CME with the largest total in the most recent quarter of $10.2 billion.
Credit risk
Now let’s change focus and look at a credit risk disclosure; the estimated largest aggregate stress loss – in excess of initial margin – that would be caused by the default of any single participant and its affiliates in extreme but plausible market conditions expressed as a peak day amount in the past 12 months.
Figure 5 shows:
- Twelve clearing services where this exposure is greater than $1 billion in the year ending December 31, 2018.
- OCC is the largest with $4.1 billion and is slightly down from a year earlier.
- LCH SwapClear is next with $4 billion, significantly up from $2.7 billion a year earlier.
- JSCC ETP (Index Futures & Options) and CCG Bond each with greater than $3 billion and higher than a year earlier.
Large amounts indeed, but we know these are extreme stress losses and these members will have significant default fund contributions in addition to their initial margin.
There is another disclosure, the actual largest aggregate credit exposure – in excess of initial margin – to any single participant and its affiliates, also expressed as a peak day amount in the past 12 months.
Figure 6 shows:
- Seven of the 12 clearing services have a non-zero number.
- Ice Futures Europe is by far the largest at $1.2 billion, massively up from $65 million a year earlier.
- Eurex with $324 million and DTCC NSCC with $235 million.
Ice Futures Europe disclosures for the quarter ending September 2018 (not shown) also show the $1.2 billion number, so it may be related to the extreme market moves in energy markets around the time of the Einar Aas default at Nasdaq.
While $1.2 billion is a large number and almost four times higher than the next largest clearing service, it is some comfort to know that it is far less than the estimated stress losses of $2.1 billion and $2.6 billion for Ice Futures Europe in figure 5. It would be a real worry if it was not.
Amir Khwaja is chief executive of Clarus Financial Technology
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら コメント
GenAIガバナンスにおけるモデル検証の再考
米国のモデルリスク責任者が、銀行が既存の監督基準を再調整する方法について概説します。
マルキールのサル:運用者の能力を測る、より優れたベンチマーク
iM Global Partnersのリュック・デュモンティエ氏とジョアン・セルファティ氏は、ある有名な実験が、株式選定者のパフォーマンスを評価する別の方法を示唆していると述べています。
IMAの現状:大きな期待と現実の対峙
最新のトレーディングブック規制は内部モデル手法を改定しましたが、大半の銀行は適用除外を選択しています。二人のリスク専門家がその理由を探ります。
地政学的リスクがどのようにシステム的なストレステストへと変化したのか
資源をめぐる争いは、時折発生するリスクプレミアムを超えた形で市場を再構築しています。
オペリスクデータ:FIS、ワールドペイとのシナジー効果の失敗の代償を支払うことに
また:ORXニュースによるデータで、リバティ・ミューチュアル、年齢差別訴訟で過去最高額を支払う;ネイションワイド、不正防止対策の不備。
東京の豊富なデータが市場への影響について明らかにすること
新たな研究により、定量金融において最も直感に反する概念の一つが普遍的であることが確認されました。
資金調達コストの配分:集中型 vs 分散型
サチン・ラナデ氏は、特に担保付融資において、集中化は資本効率と自己資本利益率(ROE)の向上に寄与し得ると述べています。
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics