Risk.net
Latest
EU seeks US-style freedom to delay rules
Power to grant “no-action relief” appears in proposals from EU Council and Parliament
Quant drought hits banks and funds in Asia
Limited pool of talent hindering expansion of sophisticated strategies across buy and sell side
Sef reforms could distort new, sounder benchmark rates
Tradition’s Fitzpatrick warns that more ways of trading swaps could dent progress made on fixings
Latest
Risk Quantum
Data insights, delivered daily
Risk Quantum finds insights in data. The service tracks the public disclosures of over 120 banks, funds, insurers, corporates, and central counterparties – as well as reports from prudential and markets regulators – in Asia, Europe and North America.
Editors' choice
Day one of a no-deal Brexit: swaps and chaperones
Banks, trading platforms, repositories tee up EU entities – and dread the repapering crunch that would follow
Big Figure
Stressed?
The stress periods used by the largest US banks to determine a portion of their market risk capital requirements vary markedly and change frequently. Stressed value-at-risk-based capital requirements are calculated by running a bank’s trading portfolio through a regulatory VAR model with inputs calibrated to historical data from a 12-month period of financial stress. Market risk capital rules state that a firm may select a stress period that is is appropriate to the “composition and directional bias of its current portfolio”. The six largest US banks all use data from various stages of the global financial crisis spanning December 1, 2007 to September 1, 2009.
Read the full article
Comment
Lessons from two commodity defaults
Swaps data: Sonia growth spreads down the curve
Op risk data: SEC issues first fine under cyber risk rule
Credit data: doom loop depends on sovereign strength
Our Take
Fischer Black was right. Somewhat
Let regulators manage no-deal risks
Searching for the end of Giancarlo’s white-paper trail
Compression lessons from Japan