SpaceX gives CME’s single-stock futures a much-needed boost
New contracts could take off as IPO bolt-on to S&P 500 contracts
US investors may finally have a reason to trade single-stock futures.
CME will list futures contracts on 55 of the largest US companies on July 27.
The instruments are already popular in Europe, with over 750,000 contracts traded daily at Eurex. While two previous efforts to bring them to the US fell flat, this time could be different.
When they first arrived in the US in the early 2000s, single-stock futures were touted as an efficient way to finance equity positions or make short bets without incurring stock-borrow costs. They can also be used to surgically add to or neutralise single-stock exposures within a wider portfolio. That could make them appealing to fund managers looking to ride the wave of mega IPOs, such as SpaceX, or bet against them.
Elon Musk’s space exploration business became the sixth largest company in the world by market cap when it went public in June, with a valuation of $1.77 trillion. But only a select few can hold the stock. SpaceX sold just 4% of its outstanding shares in the IPO, raising $85.7 billion.
Retail investors have already ploughed more than $500 million into leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds referencing SpaceX
That is one of the reasons why SpaceX is currently excluded from the S&P 500. While Nasdaq waived long-standing trading and liquidity thresholds to allow SpaceX near-immediate entry into the Nasdaq 100, S&P Dow Jones Indices held firm on its own criteria, which includes 12 months of public trading, four consecutive quarters of profitability and a minimum free float of 10%. Investors will have to wait until at least mid-2027 before they see SpaceX in the world’s most tracked equity benchmark.
Those that want exposure sooner can simply bolt a SpaceX single-stock future onto CME’s S&P 500 e-mini contracts to get their fix. The instruments could be an efficient alternative to buying shares and come with up to six times leverage to boot.
SpaceX is also one of the most shorted stocks in the market, with nearly half the free float out on loan in mid-July. As of July 22, the stock was down nearly 30% from its IPO price and over 40% from its peak. CME’s single-stock futures could appeal to short sellers that want to add to their bets even as the supply of stock available to borrow runs dry.
There are other reasons to think single-stock futures might actually catch on this time.
Retail flows have swelled since the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, most notably in targeted leveraged bets such as zero-day options. And despite a choppy start to trading, retail investors have already ploughed more than $500 million into leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds referencing SpaceX. Equity financing stress has become more evident – most notably in late 2024 and in June this year, when hedge funds piled into leveraged bets on big tech.
CME says both retail and institutional investors have already expressed strong interest in its new single-stock futures, including contracts on SpaceX.
The launch coinciding with the SpaceX hype was more luck than judgement. Risk.net first reported on CME’s plans to introduce single-stock futures on ‘Magnificent Seven’ tech names in late 2024 – long before the first indications of a SpaceX IPO.
The exchange group’s plans have since been expanded. The launch will comprise 55 names – mostly large tech firms – and include both institutional and retail-friendly contract sizes. The contracts are set to begin trading on July 27, subject to final approvals.
If the IPO pipeline is anything to go by, CME’s single-stock futures could address a growing market need to gain targeted and leveraged exposure to mega-companies that go public and remain outside benchmark indexes. Artificial intelligence giants Anthropic and OpenAI have both filed listing documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission and could go public before year-end, in deals that could value each firm at around $1 trillion.
That could provide the necessary fuel for US single-stock futures to finally get off the ground and into orbit.
Editing by Kris Devasabai
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
Have regulators gone soft on enforcement? (And should we care?)
US agencies are scaling back punishments for technical rule breaches, raising concerns that small but crucial risks may be ignored
Beyond FX HedgePool: what’s next for all-to-all?
Proponents see bright future for trading model, but obstacles to take-up remain
Basel’s CVA upgrade: persuasive in the US, less so in Europe
Ban on credit risk models could encourage US banks to adopt more sophisticated CVA method
Is alt data betting on prediction markets?
While offering a rich source of new data, legal uncertainties remain
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Private credit disclosures leave more questions than answers
Muddled metrics and scattergun reporting hinder comparison of US lenders
Surcharge of the light-touch brigade
US reform of G-Sib surcharge goes well beyond simple update