XVAs | Benchmarking
XVAs
XVA desks prioritise core tech upgrades over AI
Vendor upgrades, cloud-native rebuilds and sensitivities tooling dominate 2026 budget road maps
XVA desks target capital in optimisation runs
US regulatory uncertainty leaves banks cautious on investing in new optimisation tools, Risk Benchmarking study finds
Almost two-thirds of banks now run XVAs on cloud
Risk Benchmarking study finds a majority of big dealers tapping cloud capacity, some exclusively, with others migrating
Most banks stick to tried-and-trusted XVA models
Black Scholes- and Heath-Jarrow-Morton-based approaches dominate, with some exploring Copulas for wrong-way risk, post-Archegos
Explore the data
Two-speed FRTB
European banks are four times more likely to incorporate the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book into their XVA capital calculations versus their North American peers – reflecting the US’s continued delays in implementing Basel principles. The EU is set to go live in 2027 – but some of its banks are already factoring the potentially hefty portfolio impacts into calculations.
Take a deep dive into the findings of our 30-bank XVAs study, with interactive charts on optimisation, regulation and tech:
XVA Benchmarking: explore the data
Take a deep dive into the findings of our 30-bank study, with interactive charts covering XVA optimisation, regulation and tech stacks
Half of European banks already embed FRTB into XVA pricing
US and rest of world lag Europe in incorporation of Basel capital rules into XVA calculations, Risk Benchmarking analysis shows
Dealers favour central XVA desks, but splits remain on funding
Most banks run a single desk within the front office, but more than half share responsibility for its funding needs with treasury
XVA desks may be standard – their tech and mandates aren’t
A decade into centralised management of XVAs, Risk Benchmarking data finds divergent approaches to pricing, methodologies and tech stacks
