Time to shine: corporate FX’s surprise glow-up
Corporate FX enjoys its time in the sun as currency headwinds spark corporate hedging needs
For the last few years, there was one question that even the most seasoned foreign exchange executive has struggled to answer: “How I can get graduate traders excited about foreign exchange when even clients are not interested?”
For most corporations, managing currency risks is just a by-product of their cross-border activities, and, when rates barely moved, FX was largely an afterthought.
This lack of interest is also reflected in banks’ internal hierarchies. A macro trading head at one large dealer describes it as a scorecard that people use to assess each business. At the top are mergers and acquisitions (M&A) “because that gets your name in the paper – that’s like glory”, he says. If you can’t do that, then the next best thing is equity capital markets. Then leveraged finance. Then debt capital markets.
Streaming giant Netflix is perhaps the perfect example of the need for an effective hedging programme
And finally, all the way down at the bottom is corporate FX and derivatives. “This was called ancillary income, and FX was a part of that,” he adds.
But this is changing dramatically as negative currency headwinds, sparked by increased volatility and a persistent strengthening of the greenback, weigh heavily on corporate revenues.
It’s not hard to see why. According to recent research from treasury technology firm Kyriba, North American multinational companies that generate more than 15% of their revenues from overseas reported an FX impact of $14.7 billion on earnings in the first quarter of 2022, a 221% increase compared with the previous quarter.
Streaming giant Netflix is perhaps the perfect example of the need for an effective hedging programme. According to its second-quarter earnings, the firm outlined that it did not use FX derivatives to hedge any foreign currency exposure, stating: “Revenues would have been approximately $619 million higher had foreign currency exchange rates remained consistent with those in the same period of 2021.”
But for many others, the changing FX landscape is requiring corporate treasurers to reassess their hedging strategies that had been designed in less volatile times in order to protect future revenue.
For some, it’s about adding new hedge notionals. US sportswear manufacturer Under Armour has increased its FX hedges significantly, increasing its total FX notionals from $14.3 million at the end of March 2022 to $56.1 million at the end of June.
Some advanced treasuries are forecasting future spot movements themselves, and might reduce hedge ratios in pairs they expect to move in their favour.
For banks, this is music to their ears, after a long period of low FX volatility that acted as a disincentive to hedging.
Corporates can offer big chunky trades that are often uncorrelated with the rest of the flow from the client base. At the same time, increased volatility means wider bid-offer spreads. More broadly, it also gives the bank the opportunity to build stronger relationships for other lucrative work down the line in the other (usually) more lucrative business areas.
At a minimum, companies are trying to lock in protection using forwards until the end of 2023 – even though they are expecting volatility to stick around for much longer – and some banks are beginning to see demand from clients to hedge their FX exposures out to five years. Other dealers are seeing the return of options trading among US corporates.
When asked if the head of macro trading at the large dealer has seen a better six months for the corporate FX business, he replies “not remotely close”.
Meanwhile, investment banking division revenues – which include M&A, equity capital markets and debt capital markets – are on the slide in the current environment, according to Coalition’s first-quarter investment banking index.
The hierarchy in some ways has flipped for the moment, and so arguably there’s never been a better time to be in corporate FX.
This article was first published in sister title FX Markets
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています
FX HedgePoolを超えて:オール・トゥ・オール(All-to-All)の今後はどうなる?
この取引モデルの支持者たちは、その将来性を明るく見ていますが、普及に向けた障壁は依然として残っています。
バーゼル協定のCVA見直し:米国では説得力があるものの、欧州ではそれほどではない
信用リスクモデルの使用禁止は、米国の銀行がより高度なCVA手法を採用するきっかけとなる可能性があります
オルタナティブ・データは予測市場に賭けているのか?
新たなデータの豊富な情報源を提供する一方で、法的な不確実性は依然として残っています
「SaaSpocalypse」は、プライベート市場にリスクモデルが必要であることを示している
投資家たちは、プライベート・クレジットにおける損失がどれほど深刻なものになるか、ほとんど見当がつかない