NSCC’s year of living dangerously
The CCP’s models are falling short time and time again, and the consequences could be disastrous
As the saying goes: third time’s a charm. Except this isn’t the case for the lynchpin of the US equity markets, the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC).
Between January and March last year, the central counterparty (CCP) was caught $600 million short of its Cover 1 obligation. Simply put, it didn’t have enough liquid resources to cover the default of its largest clearing member in an extreme-but-plausible stress scenario.
Had the worst happened, members would have had to plug the hole to avoid the clearing house’s collapse. Luckily, and despite a frenzy of activity driven by the meme-stock volatility that unfolded in Q1, the worst didn’t happen.
Good news all round, some market participants may have thought. Not so fast.
As the second quarter rolled in, the NSCC was again caught off-guard to cover its worst-case hypothetical loss. This time its deficit was even greater. On two separate days in June, the CCP’s funds were short of the level required to absorb the default of its largest member by $5 billion and $1 billion, respectively.
Perhaps the CCP had learned its lesson by the third quarter. Indeed, the utility replenished its liquidity pool over this period, boosting its reserves by 7%. But again its resources proved insufficient. Option expiration days in July and September led to a spike in clearing activity, leaving the CCP’s liquid funds short by $594 million and $32.7 million, respectively.
Given its size and the role the NSCC plays within the financial system, it is paramount it is able to sustain spikes of clearing activity
A rule change implemented in June came to the rescue this time, allowing the CCP to collect extra liquidity deposits daily to cover its short-term liquidity squeeze. Without it, we might be writing a very different story today.
Given its size and the role the NSCC plays within the financial system, it is paramount it is able to sustain spikes of clearing activity. These spikes may be unpredictable, as was the case with the meme-stock surge. Or they may be foreseeable, as with option expiry dates and index rebalancing. As one of the main pipes in the plumbing of finance, the NSCC is ill-advised to leave anything to chance. But this seems to have been the case a number of times last year.
The root of the problem seems to be the NSCC’s own models. They have been repeatedly underestimating how much liquidity would be needed at all times to account for the default of any single participant and its affiliates. They have also performed poorly in helping the CCP navigate bouts of volatility by setting a member’s payment obligation too low.
So far, the worst hasn’t materialised and everything continues to be on a hypothetical level. But this might not be the case in future. Serious questions need to be raised – and answered – about the CCP’s ability to navigate stressful times. The chain reaction a failure could trigger is the stuff nightmares are made of.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Critics say perps are all froth. The numbers suggest otherwise
Healthy open interest in perpetual futures with TradFi underlyings could threaten incumbent exchanges like CME and Eurex
SpaceX gives CME’s single-stock futures a much-needed boost
New contracts could take off as IPO bolt-on to S&P 500 contracts
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
Have regulators gone soft on enforcement? (And should we care?)
US agencies are scaling back punishments for technical rule breaches, raising concerns that small but crucial risks may be ignored
Beyond FX HedgePool: what’s next for all-to-all?
Proponents see bright future for trading model, but obstacles to take-up remain
Basel’s CVA upgrade: persuasive in the US, less so in Europe
Ban on credit risk models could encourage US banks to adopt more sophisticated CVA method
Is alt data betting on prediction markets?
While offering a rich source of new data, legal uncertainties remain
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be