Libor battles aren’t over, but the war is won
Transition will shift into new phase next year, leaving systemic threats behind
Over the past four-and-a-bit years, the interest rate market has been labouring towards the common goal of safely decommissioning its most widely used benchmark, before it could either blow up or melt down.
It’s too soon to say there will be no damage, no distress after panels for the first four Libor currencies are disbanded on December 31, but it’s not too soon to say the industry has achieved its main aims. Libor looks set to power down in an orderly fashion, thanks to widespread adoption of the protocols that will re-hitch today’s contracts to new risk-free rates (RFRs) after Libor’s death, and to growing liquidity in those RFRs.
There have been plenty of bumps in the road, and the market has sometimes diverged from the course urged by regulators. History will still record it as an unprecedented challenge, and a major success.
Those involved in the effort are starting to acknowledge this.
Speaking at a Risk.net event on December 8, Edwin Schooling Latter, director for markets and wholesale policy at Libor’s regulator, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), reeled off a string of numbers “better than I would have dared to predict a year ago”, in a no-tears farewell to euro, sterling, Swiss franc and Japanese yen Libor.
“What could have been a complete disaster in the main seems to be landing pretty smoothly,” says the head of Libor transition at one major bank.
Even the Federal Reserve Bank of New York seems full of confidence, posting a meme on LinkedIn of the actress Tina Fey high-fiving herself at the thought of “2022 without Libor”.
What could have been a complete disaster in the main seems to be landing pretty smoothly
Head of Libor transition at a major bank
The story isn’t over yet. While market participants will be free to enjoy the New Year celebrations, there will be work to do when they return to their desks. While January 2022 marks the end of most Libor currencies, it is also the beginning of a new phase in the transition as fallbacks kick in for non-cleared contracts and a clean-up operation gets under way.
Because Libor rates published up to and on December 31 will remain valid for the duration of their term, fallbacks for over-the-counter contracts will be triggered over a period of time, as they hit their reset dates. These contracts will also have different interest periods and payment dates to cleared instruments. The fallbacks devised by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association maintain the original coupon dates and push the interest period back by two business days – a so-called ‘observation shift’ – to allow time for payment. Trades converted by clearing houses will retain the original observation period with a two-day payment delay. This will create a slew of mismatches and basis risks to deal with after the initial switch.
Less vanilla parts of the markets will also need further attention. It remains to be seen whether fallbacks for swaptions, which were released late and without a standard protocol for adoption, have been inserted into contracts in a consistent manner. Cross-currency swaps with a US dollar leg are another potential pothole. These could, in theory, reference Libor on the US dollar leg and an RFR on the other, creating a new basis risk in the market.
Then there’s the rump of loans and bonds relying on synthetic Libor – a safety net created by the FCA for contracts that cannot transition to new benchmarks. These instruments will also be exposed to basis risk when derivatives hedges flip to RFRs, but they face an even bigger threat. The FCA will review the need for synthetic Libor annually and has warned the market not to count on the safety net being there for long.
But these challenges are a world away from those that would have followed an unmanaged, disorderly end to Libor. There may be dents and dings in the New Year; there should not be a disaster.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています
FX HedgePoolを超えて:オール・トゥ・オール(All-to-All)の今後はどうなる?
この取引モデルの支持者たちは、その将来性を明るく見ていますが、普及に向けた障壁は依然として残っています。
バーゼル協定のCVA見直し:米国では説得力があるものの、欧州ではそれほどではない
信用リスクモデルの使用禁止は、米国の銀行がより高度なCVA手法を採用するきっかけとなる可能性があります
オルタナティブ・データは予測市場に賭けているのか?
新たなデータの豊富な情報源を提供する一方で、法的な不確実性は依然として残っています
「SaaSpocalypse」は、プライベート市場にリスクモデルが必要であることを示している
投資家たちは、プライベート・クレジットにおける損失がどれほど深刻なものになるか、ほとんど見当がつかない