Asian exotics desks need to slash risk
Time for structured products desks to curb their appetite for risk
It is becoming increasingly clear that record volumes of Asian structured products over the past two years have come at a price. Exotics desks have gorged on risk to chase market share, but with uncertainty looming, it is time to unwind.
The Hong Kong market is a case in point. The mid-October stock market rout triggered $15 million in losses across derivatives desks. In Korea, the largest structured products market in the region, local securities houses are nursing losses of up to $30 million on their hedges as the equity fall extended the tenure of the products. If markets continue their slide, the pain will only get worse.
The Street has to rewind just three years to understand the extent of any fallout from the risk it has been merrily building. In 2015, as China’s Black Monday saw the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index drop 40% from its crest, derivatives desks had to stomach hundreds of millions of dollars in hedging losses. Investors also lost money and new issue volume subsequently slid to just a third of peak levels.
Return to 2018 and the warning signs are flashing. In stark contrast to the start of the year when monthly record highs were a given, volumes have slipped and new money is no longer flowing in.
In stark contrast to the start of the year when monthly record highs were a given, volumes have slipped and new money is no longer flowing in
Narayanan Somasundaram
In Korea, dealers say local securities houses priced and hedged products on the assumption that the instruments would knock out within six months. A fall in stock markets disrupted that thesis. Duration of the instruments has extended to over a year, leaving the desks dangerously exposed.
One way to address the problem is to print new products that would even out dealers’ positions. Unfortunately for exotics desks, the market fall has sapped investor appetite. Monthly trade volume has halved from the record $8 billion seen at the start of the year, leaving desks with just one alternative: sell put options to flatten exposure to long vega – a dealer’s sensitivity to volatility. That comes at a hefty cost due to one-way demand.
In Hong Kong, the problem stems from a structural evolution in popular callable bull bear contracts. Dealers have gradually narrowed the distance between the call and the strike level in the instruments to lure investors in with the promise of improved returns. The narrower the gap, the more likely the contract is to knock out with a low or zero residual value. It makes the trade cheaper to enter while at the same time maintaining exposure to movements on the underlying index. The compression effectively means higher gearing. The rewards may be more enticing but, crucially, the risks are also amplified.
A narrow call-to-strike gap may work well in gradually rising markets, but it can be hazardous in the event of a sudden drop. That is because dealers have only a tiny window to offload hedges when markets fall. For example, to hedge a bull certificate, trading desks buy shares in the underlying index or security at the inception of the contract. If spot falls below the call price, desks unwind their hedges by selling the shares. If the market opens sharply lower, as happened in mid-October, that hedging window might never even open. The losses can be crippling.
The genesis of excess leverage and risk can be traced to a thirst for returns against a backdrop of extreme lows in volatility and interest rates.
That is changing. A key gauge of US stock market volatility, the CBOE’s Vix index, hit its highest level since the February market fluctuations in October. It continues to hold well above its five-year average. Global interest rates have risen, thanks to monetary tightening around the world. Rising uncertainty over the strength of global economic growth means stocks could come under further pressure.
The latest round of losses should serve as a wake-up call. With market dynamics reversing, it is time for structured products desks to curb their risk appetite. October’s rout may have been manageable, but it could just be a taste of the pain yet to come.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
トランプ流の世界がトレンドにとって良い理由
トランプ氏の政策転換はリターンに打撃を与えました。しかし、彼を大統領の座に押し上げた勢力が、この投資戦略を再び活性化させる可能性があります。
Roll over, SRTs: Regulators fret over capital relief trades
Banks will have to balance the appeal of capital relief against the risk of a market shutdown
オムニバス(法案)の下に投げる:GARはEUの環境規制後退を乗り切れるのか?
停止措置でEU主要銀行の90%が報告を放棄で、グリーンファイナンス指標が宙ぶらりんな状態に
コリンズ修正条項はエンドゲームを迎えたのでしょうか?
スコット・ベッセント氏は、デュアル・キャピタル・スタックを終わらせたいと考えています。それが実際にどのように機能するかは、まだ不明です。
トーキング・ヘッズ2025:トランプ氏の大きな美しい債券を購入するのは誰でしょうか?
国債発行とヘッジファンドのリスクが、マクロ経済の重鎮たちを悩ませています。
AIの説明可能性に関する障壁は低くなってきている
改良され、使いやすいツールは、複雑なモデルを素早く理解するのに役立ちます。
BISの取引高はトレンドを大きく上回っているのか
最新の3年ごとの調査において、外国為替市場の日次平均取引高は9.6兆ドルに急増しましたが、これらの数値は代表的なものと言えるでしょうか。
DFASTのモノカルチャー自身が自分の試練となる
ストレステスト開示の頻度と範囲が減少したため、銀行によるFRBモデルの模倣を監視することが困難となっております。