Crunch time for climate-related risk exposure
As governments worldwide focus on the coronavirus (Covid‑19) pandemic amid plummeting demand for fossil fuels, it may seem climate change has dropped down the global agenda.
The long-term impact of Covid‑19 on green investment and climate movement is unclear, but it is widely thought that low oil prices and economic recession will slow the transition to the low-carbon economy.
However, now is not the time to drop the ball on assessing and addressing climate risk. Once social distancing measures are lifted and the world’s thirst for oil resumes, harmful emissions will ramp up again – possibly at even greater levels than before due to the lower cost of fossil fuels. Oil prices could remain in the doldrums for some time, even with higher demand, due to the huge inventories that have built up.
At the same time, severe weather events will continue wreaking havoc more frequently, putting the spotlight once again on climate change and bringing renewed pressure to create a low-carbon economy.
And, still reeling from the economic crisis caused by Covid-19, regulators and central banks will be at pains to avoid another systemic financial meltdown due to the transition to a low-carbon world. The onus will once again be on individual firms to assess and mitigate their own risk exposures.
It’s no easy feat. But firms that don’t assess the climate risk in their portfolios, or hedge or divest their exposures accordingly, could see some of their assets lose significant value over time. In the meantime, they may fall foul of increasingly stricter regulation.
In April 2019, for example, the Bank of England (BoE) released its supervisory statement for banks and insurers outlining the financial risks from climate change and the strategic approach needed to manage these risks. The guidance has forced institutions to consider their initial plans for putting frameworks in place, as well as nominating senior individuals who will be ‘climate-responsible’.
Later, in December last year, the BoE submitted proposals for climate change stress tests, which would require banks and insurers to test the resilience of their portfolios against more frequent severe weather events and transition risk. An article in this report, Show don’t tell – BoE’s climate stress test dilemma, discusses the industry’s opinions of the proposed stress tests.
The report then turns to the topic of physical climate risk in Why forecasting climate change is a disaster. This looks at how challenging it is to assess physical climate risk given widely differing long-term forecasts.
We then take a look at the risks that the low-carbon economy poses to certain sectors of industry, in particular fossil fuel producers that could find themselves with stranded assets. In Calls to hike climate policy raise risk for oil firms, we ask how and when the transition will curb demand for fossil fuels and how firms are estimating and measuring their exposure to this risk.
The report concludes with two interviews addressing different aspects of climate change. In a Q&A, Commissioner Rostin Benham of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission talks about ways of tackling market risk caused by climate change. He calls for new derivatives products and other products for risk transfer to be made available to help firms manage their individual exposures to climate risk.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Four in five banks report breaching risk appetite in past year
Risk Benchmarking: Those reporting no breaches run skinnier appetite frameworks, despite similar governance mechanisms
Slimmed-down and automated, ERM seeks a seat at the top table
Latest Risk Benchmarking exercise finds ERM growing in influence, even as headcounts shrink
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
JSCC faces pushback on plans to merge futures default funds
Members say commodities products should be kept fully segregated because of different risk profile
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets