Thirty years of Risk magazine
Special features will look at the future of bank technology, quantitative research, risk transfer and regulation
This year is the 30th anniversary of Risk magazine’s launch; good going for a title that started life with a relatively hazy mission, and journalists who spent the first couple of years “fumbling our way through uncharted territory”, as founder Peter Field later wrote.
The magazine was not alone in that. Bankers Trust, Morgan Grenfell, Salomon Brothers, Swiss Banking Corporation and other long-gone names were exploring the potential of the over-the-counter derivatives markets on trading floors that had a single desktop computer; the International Swap Dealers Association was drawing up its first master agreement; and the bank regulators of 12 nations were working on a common prudential framework that would come to be known as the Basel Capital Accord.
As the world has changed, so has the content of Risk magazine, but the quantitative, technical thread running through the coverage remains the same – and so does our aim. As was the case for Peter and his original team, our journalists today are still looking for important, under-reported stories in the worlds of risk management and risk transfer.
There is another similarity. Today, market participants are again taking tentative steps into a world with no maps. Wherever you look, business models, products and services are being challenged – many are already in flux – and the winners have yet to be decided.
So, we will not be spending our anniversary year looking backwards. Over the course of 2017, we will examine some of the topics where the scope for change seems greatest, and try to sketch out the future.
First, we will look at some of the ways in which dealers are trying to use technology to buttress their trading businesses. That crop of articles will be available online later in February, and will appear in the next print edition.
Then, in sequence, we’ll be looking at the changing role of quants and how the leading quantitative finance courses are adapting; the transfer of exotic risks from dealers to asset managers; and the future of international regulatory standards. We’ll pick two more topics as the year wears on, and will also be running a series of interviews with some of the biggest names from around our markets. All of this material will bear the ‘Risk30’ logo.
Trying to divine the future can, of course, be perilous, but journalists have far less to lose than the individuals and organisations we write for. Good luck to all of you, and many thanks for your support over the years.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos