Blockbuster banks eye Netflix success
Incumbents have big ideas – but lots of baggage
When banks describe how they plan to use technology to transform their businesses, they invoke wildly popular disruptors and innovators, such as Amazon and Netflix.
Amazon because – if a bank collects enough client data and analyses it well enough – it might be able to sell as effectively as the online retail titan, which surrounds each sale with an array of suggestions, and seeks to anticipate its customers’ needs.
Netflix because – if a bank is able to break away from the prevailing distribution model – it might create a lasting advantage over its stuck-in-the-mud competition, as the streaming media service did to incumbent video rental business, Blockbuster.
That’s all well and good – it makes sense to set your goals with reference to well-known winners. But there are lots of people in the world who have unrealistic aspirations.
To pick an example with whom I am familiar, my five-year old son wants to be a great grey owl. Or a martial eagle. Time and enthusiasm are on his side, but not much else.
The reason it is unrealistic for banks to set expectations with reference to Amazon and Netflix is that both firms were disruptors from the off. Technology offered a way to recast an existing business model, and they were focused every day on winning customers and proving it could work. In contrast, banks are incumbents with an established client base, existing technology and a variety of motives behind their technology push – they want to cut costs, to be more efficient, to meet client needs, to head off possible disruptors in their own markets. Each of these goals might suggest a slightly different strategy.
In short, the challenge facing the banks is less about launching Amazon or Netflix, and more about overhauling Blockbuster.
Taken together, this is essentially the argument our first batch of 30th-anniversary articles explores. Over the past few days, we have published stories about the commercialisation of in-house risk technology, plans to revamp the fixed-income sales function, and the obstacles that have so far prevented banks embracing new technologies.
Our second batch of articles will look at the changing role of quants within the financial markets, and at how – and whether – the world’s leading quant finance courses are adapting to meet the industry’s needs.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts