Crypto structured products come of age
After some growing pains, the space is now offering the type of structures seen in TradFi equities markets
For the traditional wealth management client base, structured products have long ruled the roost. The mighty equity autocallable, in particular, has long been a favourite of investors, giving them a cushion of downside protection combined with upside exposure to single stocks or baskets.
Over the past year, though, the crypto industry has quietly been working on its own versions of structured products that are becoming more and more sophisticated as the months roll on.
These have largely existed in a corner of the crypto landscape known as decentralised finance (DeFi) – that is, unconnected to any centralised exchange such as Binance or FTX. Instead, the investor utilises smart contracts to conduct the investment strategy on their behalf.
While a centralised platform might block users from using derivatives depending on its jurisdiction’s regulatory status – for instance, UK retail users cannot trade crypto futures on most large, centralised venues – DeFi has no such restrictions. That means users can access sophisticated derivatives strategies that would otherwise be beyond their reach – for better or worse.
The original crypto structured products were housed in so-called DeFi options vaults (DOVs). Users deposit crypto anonymously into the DOVs – whether that be stablecoins like tether or USDC, or assets such as ethereum (ETH) or bitcoin – and the DOVs go out and run an investment strategy on behalf of the investors.
The original DOVs ran simple covered call or put selling strategies. The first and biggest protocol offering DOVs is Ribbon Finance, with $78 million in its DOVs as of November 4, according to aggregator site DefiLlama, down from a peak of more than $300 million in May – before the onset of the so-called crypto winter. Other larger protocols include Thetanuts and StakeDAO, which also offer similar products.
The ETH covered call DOV at Ribbon takes deposits in ETH and sells out-of-the-money one-week ETH calls at 10 delta to earn the premium, which amounts to around 0.25–0.45% a week. If the options finish in-the-money, the premium is lost and the rise in the underlying ETH asset is effectively capped. Investors are still exposed to the underlying ETH losing value, however.
The put selling vaults typically see the user deposit stablecoins into the DOV, which sells downside puts and collects a premium. These are a bit riskier, as there is no natural offset if the puts expire in-the-money.
The options are sold via auction at 9am UTC on a Friday. However, as the size and timing of the options selling is well known in advance, market-makers can anticipate the flow. Implied volatilities on weekly ETH options around the time of the auction are typically about four vols below the previous 24 hours, according to research from Paradigm.
According to their research, that equates to around 0.1% less in premiums, or 5.35% annually in missed gains. Market-makers buying the options, on the other hand, say they need to position themselves for these flows, which some say are responsible for roughly a quarter of the entire supply of crypto options volatility and run into billions of dollars of notionals every week at some market-makers.
This raised questions as to whether the DOVs were a victim of their own success and caused some to wonder whether further expansion was possible. Ribbon, for instance, looked at running more random, unannounced intra-week auctions, but this sparked concern among market-makers that they would be unable to handle the flow without sufficient notice. In its research note, Paradigm suggests pre-announcing but spreading out the auctions to mitigate the impact on implied volatility.
But despite these growing pains, the firms haven’t been put off and have instead looked to create newer, more sophisticated strategies.
Ribbon launched a principal-protected product in August, which earns yield from lending USDC deposits to market-makers such as Folkvang and Wintermute and uses a portion of the interest payments to buy weekly out-of-the-money barrier options at around 8% on the top and downside. It offers a base yield of 4% with the potential for yields of up to 13%, depending on whether the options finish in-the-money.
The question now is where crypto structured products can go next. Those in the know say the end game for firms like Ribbon is to offer the full range of private banking-type products, including autocallables.
Some suggest they could be a disrupter to the TradFi private banking market, but with a broader base given the lack of a minimum wealth requirement to invest. However, after the troubles in crypto earlier this year, the assets under management of the likes of Ribbon took a hit and have remained fairly stable since.
On the institutional side, plenty of firms are bullish in this space. The past year has seen a number of them spring up to service institutional clients looking for crypto structured investments without necessarily wanting to dip into DeFi themselves or in need of bespoke structuring solutions. These firms include OrBit Markets and Enhanced Digital Group, which were founded by former derivatives traders at large sell-side banks.
If institutional investors rediscover the interest in the space they showed before the crypto winter set in, who knows where it might lead?
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
なぜ破綻処理計画を骨抜きにするのは良くないのか
銀行の破綻は避けられないものですが、銀行危機はそうではありません
日本の「大還流」?急速なリパトリは期待できない
GPIFによる米国債から日本国債への切り替えは段階的に行われる見通しであり、これはヘッジファンドにとってさらなる悪材料となる可能性があります
AIエージェントが、信頼できないスタッフのような存在である理由
GenAIシステムに内在する不確実性により、リスク管理担当者はより対立的なアプローチをとらざるを得ません
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています
FX HedgePoolを超えて:オール・トゥ・オール(All-to-All)の今後はどうなる?
この取引モデルの支持者たちは、その将来性を明るく見ていますが、普及に向けた障壁は依然として残っています。