Are decentralised exchanges the future for trading?
Success of blockchain venues has implications even beyond crypto
Hayden Adams launched the decentralised crypto exchange Uniswap on November 2, 2018 by tweeting to his 200 followers and handing out home-printed T-shirts at an industry event. Three years later, spot trading on the new platform had reached the equivalent of $86 billion a day.
Decentralised exchanges such as Uniswap and the outlandishly named Sushiswap and Pancakeswap allow crypto buyers and sellers to trade at a price dictated by a protocol written on blockchain-based smart contracts.
They rely on automated market-maker algorithms to compute prices based on the relative weight of buyers and sellers in a single pool. It’s a different approach to the limit order book as used on centralised exchanges, where traders log bids and offers in a laddered hierarchy and wait to be matched.
Uniswap et al – part of the decentralised finance (aka ‘DeFi’) trend sweeping crypto – have grown fast to snap at the heels of centralised competitors such as Binance, Coinbase Exchange and FTX.
At one point, about a quarter of crypto spot trading was being done through the newer venues, data from The Block shows.
Could the upstarts, which function without central custodians, one day come to dominate? Recent research says they can – and probably will. Some even think the decentralised model will become the norm in traditional asset classes too.
The all-in transaction costs of decentralised versus centralised exchanges in crypto are roughly even, academics from the University of St Gallen and Swiss Finance Institute found. And Uniswap’s bid/ask spreads are similar or better, and more stable, than leading centralised competitors.
Centralised – ‘CeFi’ – venues are less vulnerable to price dislocations, it seems. Arbitrage trades are expensive on decentralised exchanges because gas fees apply at each of the multiple trading steps often needed. These fees don’t apply on a centralised hub, which operates off-chain.
Reductions in gas fees, though, together with a modest increase in trading volumes would tip the balance in favour of decentralised exchanges, the researchers estimate. And gas fees are expected to come down after the ethereum blockchain’s recent move to a proof-of-stake model.
“It’s going to be harder and harder for centralised exchanges to be profitable,” says Andrea Barbon, assistant professor of finance at the University of St Gallen. In crypto, decentralised exchanges may “take over a huge fraction of market share”, he thinks.
Of course, market participants have reasons other than cost savings to trade on more conventional venues: technical hitches can take time to fix on a decentralised protocol, for example (the process occurs through participants voting for updates).
Regulators may seek to ensure that trading stays on centralised exchanges where they can exercise control or carry out surveillance more easily.
But crypto traders are quick to adopt new practices, as shown already by the rapid advance of decentralised venues so far. “We are always looking at liquidity and [on that metric] the decentralised exchanges are coming up,” said Hugo Langéen, CEO and co-founder at Valid Alpha, a crypto hedge fund, speaking at Risk.net’s Cryptocurrency Trading Forum in September. If that continues, he said, his fund would switch more of its trading.
Crypto’s credit crisis in recent months, in which several large players in the space collapsed causing knock-on losses for others, might even spur the process. Truly decentralised parts of the infrastructure “worked perfectly” during the upheaval, argues Magnus Holm, CIO at Hilbert Capital, a systematic crypto fund.
Carol Alexander, a professor at the University of Sussex, told delegates at the conference that DeFi could potentially dominate nine-to-one in crypto in as little as two or three years.
And it might not stop there. Niclas Sandstrom, Hilbert’s CEO, says volatility in gas fees, trades getting rejected and latency remain DeFi’s weaknesses, for now. But those will all change. “We’re not there yet,” he says. “But decentralised exchanges will take over in future.”
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
ファニーメイとフレディマックによる住宅ローン買い入れが金利上昇を招く可能性は低い
9兆ドル規模の市場において2,000億ドルのMBSを追加しても、従来のヘッジ戦略を復活させることはできません。
2025年の影響度合い:デリバティブ価格設定が主導的役割を担い、クオンツはAIの群れに追随しない
金利とボラティリティのモデリング、ならびに取引執行は、クオンツの優先事項の最上位に位置しております。
株式には、投資家が見落としている可能性のある「賭け要素」が存在する
投機的取引は、対象となる株式によって異なる形で、暗号資産と株式市場との間に連動関係を生み出します。
パッシブ投資とビッグテック:相性の悪い組み合わせ
トラッカーファンドがアクティブ運用会社を締め出し、ごく少数の株式に対して過熱した評価をもたらしています。
粘着性のあるインフレに対する懸念がくすぶり続けている
Risk.netの調査によると、投資家たちはインフレの終息を宣言する準備がまだ整っていないことが判明しましたが、それには十分な理由があります。
トランプ流の世界がトレンドにとって良い理由
トランプ氏の政策転換はリターンに打撃を与えました。しかし、彼を大統領の座に押し上げた勢力が、この投資戦略を再び活性化させる可能性があります。
Roll over, SRTs: Regulators fret over capital relief trades
Banks will have to balance the appeal of capital relief against the risk of a market shutdown
オムニバス(法案)の下に投げる:GARはEUの環境規制後退を乗り切れるのか?
停止措置でEU主要銀行の90%が報告を放棄で、グリーンファイナンス指標が宙ぶらりんな状態に