Three adjustments in calibrating models with neural networks
New research addresses fundamental issues with ANN approximation of pricing models
To calibrate a pricing model to market data, one needs to set up an optimisation problem in which the difference between model prices and market prices is minimised. Because this process has to be repeated frequently and it is computationally expensive, more efficient solutions are in high demand.
Artificial neural network (ANN) approaches, given their natural suitability to solve optimisation problems, are seen as a promising way of cutting some corners and delivering model parameters much quicker than standard approaches. Quants have been exploring this method for some years.
Typically, the ANN calibration procedure is made up of two steps. First, the neural network is trained with market data to set its node weights. Second, the parameters of some standard pricing models, such as the Black-Scholes model, are calibrated using the trained network, so the option prices can be produced. The speed improvement comes from the fact that the first step is done only once, and its results can be used to calibrate the pricing model multiple times more quickly than in the standard approach.
However, this solution is not optimal and can be slimmed down to be more efficient, believes Andrey Itkin, an adjunct professor at NYU’s department of risk and financial engineering and senior research associate at Bank of America.
In his paper, Deep learning calibration of option pricing models: some pitfalls and solutions, Itkin aims to improve on the existing ANN calibration methods on multiple fronts, namely efficiency, applicability and completeness.
One suggestion is to eliminate the second phase of calibration of a pricing model altogether, which he considers unnecessary and can be done as part of the first phase. “When we trained the neural network, we had actually already done this job – we had already found the optimisation solution,” he says.
Itkin achieves this by using the inverse map approach, a method that allows him to track the input variables from the output of the neural network.
The computational cost and time required to perform the two-step calibration are known problems and attempts to eliminate the second step have been proposed before, but the results were not deemed to be satisfactorily stable.
A drawback of the artificial neural network approach to calibration is that prices obtained this way are not guaranteed to be arbitrage free. This is because the ANN is merely an approximator and as such the approximations to the model prices, even when they are very close to the real prices, can produce some arbitrage opportunities, especially for out-of-sample data.
To avoid arbitrage, Itkin suggests switching from unconstrained optimisation to one with soft constraints. These constraints take the form of a penalty function incorporated into the objective function of the optimisation. This guarantees to keep the price almost always within given boundaries. “That practically eliminates the arbitrage from the in-sample set,” Itkin says.
A further improvement in efficiency comes with the calculation of Greeks, or the sensitivities of option prices to other variables such as volatility or changes in interest rates. To generate Greeks of good quality, one needs to pay attention to the activation function of the neural network – the function that determines its output by activating nodes and transforming inputs into outputs.
Itkin reviews some common types of activation functions, highlighting the pros and cons of each of them. He stresses, however, that they need to be continuous and twice differentiable in order to be suitable for the calculation of second-order sensitivities, such as gamma, and proposes a modified activation function so the whole ANN is twice differentiable.
Currently, some software packages can provide estimates of Greeks. But because they normally use activation functions that are not twice differentiable, the Greeks obtained that way might be of poor quality, especially second-order ones.
The calibration of pricing models is a novel and promising application of ANNs. A paper released last year by Blanka Horvath, Aitor Muguruza and Mehdi Tomas applied image recognition deep learning techniques to the problem, earning the trio Risk.net’s inaugural Rising Star in Quant Finance award.
Itkin himself is looking at advancing his research in the field. He and fellow academic Peter Carr are looking to build on a model they proposed in a previous paper by calibrating it to market data using the approach explained above.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています
FX HedgePoolを超えて:オール・トゥ・オール(All-to-All)の今後はどうなる?
この取引モデルの支持者たちは、その将来性を明るく見ていますが、普及に向けた障壁は依然として残っています。
バーゼル協定のCVA見直し:米国では説得力があるものの、欧州ではそれほどではない
信用リスクモデルの使用禁止は、米国の銀行がより高度なCVA手法を採用するきっかけとなる可能性があります
オルタナティブ・データは予測市場に賭けているのか?
新たなデータの豊富な情報源を提供する一方で、法的な不確実性は依然として残っています
「SaaSpocalypse」は、プライベート市場にリスクモデルが必要であることを示している
投資家たちは、プライベート・クレジットにおける損失がどれほど深刻なものになるか、ほとんど見当がつかない