Searching for the end of Giancarlo’s white-paper trail
CFTC chairman faces key test to turn thought leadership into real reform
A tough-talking former interdealer broker executive who complained about regulatory overreach during his time as a commissioner after 2014, Christopher Giancarlo seemed a natural choice as chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). He was the man to fulfil president Donald Trump’s pledge to “do a number” on Dodd-Frank.
And yet, so far, his main output has consisted of white papers – more commonly used as a marketing tool by private companies than as a policy-making tool by regulators.
After a white paper entitled Swaps Regulation Version 2.0 was published in April, Democrat commissioner Rostin Behnam appeared to lose patience, saying: “Adding another white paper just pushes back the timeline for getting to actual deliverables. It adds another step to the process. It also takes a lot of staff time when budgets are tight.”
And budgets keep on getting tighter. Even though the CFTC is partly responsible for the multi-trillion-dollar swaps market, which played a significant role in the 2008 financial crisis, it is reportedly being forced to consider buying out senior staff. Despite Giancarlo’s pleas for more money, a Congress dominated by his Republican allies has, alarmingly, reduced the agency’s already paltry budget instead.
There has been some justification for Giancarlo’s hesitancy in producing concrete legislative proposals. He was hamstrung by delays to Congressional approval for his last two commissioners, Republican Dawn Stump and Democrat Dan Berkovitz, who were only sworn in at the start of September. They are both widely respected, but even the most competent commissioner takes some weeks to acclimatise to the job; Giancarlo would have been loath to put too much in front of them too soon.
Nonetheless, Giancarlo’s decision to add yet another white paper – Cross-border Swaps Regulation Version 2.0 – at the start of October has raised some eyebrows.
What Giancarlo says is that the white paper is a “concept release”. But proper concept releases solicit the public’s view on a topic, so that an agency can evaluate the need for further rulemaking
“Strange”. “Odd”. “An unusual choice”. This is how various derivatives lawyers, lobbyists and some former CFTC staffers have described a document that even admits it is not an official agency communication.
As chairman, Giancarlo now leads the agenda and has other options available to him, all of which open up dialogue with the public and the industry he is regulating. He could, for instance, issue a notice of proposed rulemaking. And if he feels the issue is not mature enough yet and needs more public consultation, he could issue an advance notice.
What Giancarlo says is that the white paper is a “concept release”. But proper concept releases solicit the public’s view on a topic, so that an agency can evaluate the need for further rulemaking. Yet, anyone who feels particularly strongly about the extraterritorial regulation of the swaps market must wait until the rule is proposed before they can offer input. And that will not be soon, as Giancarlo himself acknowledged in an exclusive interview with Risk.net earlier this month.
Diplomatic motivation
One explanation could be that the October white paper is primarily motivated by diplomacy. Giancarlo has been vigorously trying to avoid the US swaps market becoming collateral damage as the European Union reacts to Brexit by tightening some of its own cross-border derivatives rules. A 500-plus-page legal document is less likely to grab the attention of EU policy-makers than a snappy piece of thought leadership promising to eliminate some of the obstacles for European firms trading derivatives with US clients.
This, incidentally, may also explain Giancarlo’s oddly servile mea culpa delivered at the London Guildhall in September – he is prepared to abase himself a little if it means maintaining hard-won equivalence agreements with the EU.
But one former CFTC lawyer points out that white papers can be useful dry runs, and their contents have found their way into previous regulations. The CFTC is to propose reform of swap execution facilities within the next few weeks and there is a good chance that the rulemaking notice will draw heavily on the April white paper.
If Giancarlo also delivers on his promise to table final rules on commodity position limits within the next six months, he may at last start to move on from the slightly abstract approach so far and live up to his ‘man of action’ reputation.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 我々の見解
AIエージェントが、信頼できないスタッフのような存在である理由
GenAIシステムに内在する不確実性により、リスク管理担当者はより対立的なアプローチをとらざるを得ません
批判派は、パーペチュアルはすべてフロスだと言っています。しかし、数字はそうではないことを示唆している
TradFiを原資産とする永久先物に対する堅調な未決済建玉は、CMEやEurexといった既存の取引所にとって脅威となる可能性があります
SpaceXがCMEの個別銘柄先物に待望の追い風をもたらした
S&P 500先物契約へのIPO関連の追加契約として、新たな契約が急増する可能性があります
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
規制当局はエンフォースメントを甘くしているのか?(そして、私たちはそれを気にするべきなのか?)
米国の規制当局は、技術的な規則違反に対する罰則を緩和しており、小さくとも重要なリスクが見過ごされてしまうのではないかという懸念が高まっています
FX HedgePoolを超えて:オール・トゥ・オール(All-to-All)の今後はどうなる?
この取引モデルの支持者たちは、その将来性を明るく見ていますが、普及に向けた障壁は依然として残っています。
バーゼル協定のCVA見直し:米国では説得力があるものの、欧州ではそれほどではない
信用リスクモデルの使用禁止は、米国の銀行がより高度なCVA手法を採用するきっかけとなる可能性があります
オルタナティブ・データは予測市場に賭けているのか?
新たなデータの豊富な情報源を提供する一方で、法的な不確実性は依然として残っています