In-house development seen as too costs

Technology Round Table: challenges ahead for the future

supplement-cover-it-rt-dec09

This is an extended version of an article appearing in Technology Round Table: challenges ahead for the future.

“If you really believe you can build a better system than a vendor and if you believe that a technological edge is advantageous to you,” says Martin Koopman at FMO, “then in-house development is best.”

He believes there is not much competitive edge in having a slightly better portfolio management system that another fund. There is if you believe you can write a better way to consider

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

Next-generation technologies and the future of trading

At a Risk.net webinar in association with capital markets technology provider Numerix, panellists discuss the potential for increased adoption of the public cloud to boost investment performance, its impact on risk management and overcoming barriers to…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here