Banks battle to preserve ‘good value’ IRB models

Improving credit risk modelling assumptions could soften Basel's push for input floors

datarescue
Good supervision relies on benchmarking data in a comparable way between banks

The Basel Committee's proposed amendments to the capital framework for credit risk, published on March 24, will inevitably evoke a strong reaction from banks when they respond before the June 24 consultation deadline. Credit risk accounts for the vast majority of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) on the balance sheets of most banks – often as high as 80% for all but the largest dealer banks.

Divisions between regulators on the value of internal models have been evident for some time. US regulators

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: