Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges

Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks

bowling_Getty-web.jpg
Systemic risk hit: there is real alarm about the proposal to remove the cap

Global banks with large asset custodian businesses may face higher capital requirements if the Basel Committee’s systemic bank assessment methodology, currently under a routine review, is changed in an effort to reflect systemic risk more accurately.

BNY Mellon, Citigroup, JP Morgan and State Street would be the most affected if the cap on one of five categories in the methodology – ’substitutability’ – is removed, say bank lobbyists and academics.

“It is very important to take seriously this

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: