Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges

Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks

bowling_Getty-web.jpg
Systemic risk hit: there is real alarm about the proposal to remove the cap

Global banks with large asset custodian businesses may face higher capital requirements if the Basel Committee’s systemic bank assessment methodology, currently under a routine review, is changed in an effort to reflect systemic risk more accurately.

BNY Mellon, Citigroup, JP Morgan and State Street would be the most affected if the cap on one of five categories in the methodology – ’substitutability’ – is removed, say bank lobbyists and academics.

“It is very important to take seriously this

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: