Mooted VAR substitute cannot be back-tested, says top quant


The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has proposed replacing value-at-risk with a metric, expected shortfall, that fails to meet a key criterion of its mooted new trading book regime – it cannot be properly back-tested – according to Paul Embrechts, professor of mathematics at Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH Zürich).

In the fundamental review of its Basel 2.5 trading book capital rules, published in May last year, the Basel Committee proposed getting rid of VAR – a metric

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: