Basel regulators don’t foresee lengthy talks on Basel II
BASEL – Global banking regulators don’t foresee lengthy talks with banks when they issue their third and final consultation paper next year on the complex and much-delayed Basel II bank capital accord.
The committee expects to issue CP 3 in the second quarter of next year, preparatory to issuing by the end of 2003 a final version of the risk-based accord aimed at making the world’s banking system safer.
The committee’s views were contained in an overview paper that accompanied the key third quantitative impact study, or QIS 3, that the Basel regulators began issuing to more than 200 banks in over 40 countries yesterday.
QIS 3 will seek information from the banks on how the new accord would affect them. The QIS 3 survey sets out the proposed minimum capital charges that will be required of banks under Basel II and gives banks a clear idea of how the regulators envisage the shape of the final accord. Responses have to be returned by December 20.
The Basel regulators want to apply the accord in the first instance to the large, international banks of the leading economies from late 2006. Basel II will determine how much of their assets the banks will have to aside as a cushion of capital to absorb unexpected losses from banking risks, including credit, market and operational risks.
The Basel Committee said the rationale for a short CP 3 comment period was that it had consulted with the banking industry and others throughout the process of revising the current Basel I capital adequacy accord and will continue to do so.
The paper did not say how long a comment period was envisaged. CP 2, the second Basel II consultation paper issued in January last year, allowed for a three-month comment period.
The current, and simpler, Basel I accord dates from 1988 and has been adopted by over 100 countries.
BaselAlert.com
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US