
Key Basel II package expected tomorrow
The committee will issue the third quantitative impact study on Basel II, QIS 3, to some 265 banks, large and small, in nearly 50 countries. The regulators will want replies in by December 20.
QIS 3 will be accompanied by a paper giving an overview of progress with the much-delayed and controversial capital adequacy accord that regulators claim will make the world’s banking system safer.
There will also be a paper giving the Basel regulators’ latest thoughts on the thorny technical issue of the treatment of the risks to banks of asset securitisation, where banks put loans into a pool and issue new securities against the pool. Asset securitisation is the last major issue outstanding with the accord, which regulators originally wanted to introduce in 2004 but that is now scheduled for late 2006.
Basel II intends to align bank protective capital more closely to the risks actually faced by banks.
The information accompanying QIS 3 will give banks a very clear idea of how the Basel regulators envisage the final accord. The survey will provide the risk-weight functions, formulas and so-called pillar 1 capital charges and rules that they can apply to the information they have collected for draft QIS 3 spreadsheets issued in July. Basel II has a three-pillar structure of capital charges under pillar 1, supervision by regulators under pillar 2 and the exercise of market discipline through greater disclosure under pillar 3.
As well as reviewing progress with the accord, the overview paper will try to provide answers to charges that Basel II is far too complex and that its risk-sensitive provisions could be “pro-cyclical”. By the latter charge, critics mean the accord could result in banks over-restricting their lending at the bottom of economic cycles and over-lending in boom times, thus reinforcing the extremes of the cycle.
The securitisation paper should provide new proposed risk-weightings for calculating capital charges against asset securitisations that are rated by the leading credit rating agencies. The paper will also provide a formula that regulators can use to calculate the capital charges for securitisation issues that aren’t normally rated by the agencies.
The responses and reactions to tomorrow’s Basel II package will be taken on board by the regulators as they prepare the third Basel II consultation paper that they hope to issue for industry comment in May next year.
The Basel supervisors expect to issue the final version of Basel II late next year, giving banks and their regulators some three years to ready themselves for implementation in late 2006.
The Basel II accord will replace the current, and much simpler, Basel 1 accord that dates from 1988, which has been adopted by over 100 countries.
David Keefe
For similar articles please visit www.BaselAlert.com - an indispensable source of news, comment and analysis on the development of the Basel II accord and banking supervision. The site contains a searchable archive of news, articles and technical papers, and a free monthly e-mail summary. Click here for a free trial.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US