Ceiops issues second set of Solvency II Level 2 CPs
EC committee publishes for consultation its second set of advice on Solvency II Level 2 implementing measures
FRANKFURT - The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (Ceiops) has released for consultation its second set of advice on Solvency II - Level 2 implementing measures.
The consultation papers (CPs) are issued in response to the European Commission's request for fully consulted advice on Level 2 implementing measures and its recommendation to develop Level 3 guidance on certain areas to foster supervisory convergence.
The CPs deal with a large number of Pillar I, II and III and group issues, which have been developed on the basis of the Solvency II Level 1 text adopted by the European Parliament on April 22.
After consultation, Ceiops will finalise the papers for submission to the European Commission, taking into account the comments received and the lessons learned from the crisis.
The CPs are accompanied by a cover note that offers information on the topics consulted upon. The deadline for comments is September 11. Ceiops has already consulted on a first set of advice on Level 2 measures and will consult on one further set, expected to be released at the beginning of November.
Click here for the CPs.
Click here for the cover note.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
- Filling gaps in market data with optimal transport