UBS SUED BY HSH NORDBANK ON SUBPRIME MORTGAGE SECURITIES
NEW YORK - Swiss investment bank UBS is facing a lawsuit from German bank HSH Nordbank, the largest global provider of shipping finance, over the mis-selling of subprime mortgage securities. The German bank has stated that it intends to sue UBS in New York courts to recoup losses to its $500 million (£254 million) investment fund. The Swiss bank is still recovering from the biggest quarterly loss in banking history and seeing writedowns reach $18.1 billion (£9.2 billion). UBS is also currently considering emergency funding measures from GIC, a Singapore sovereign wealth fund, and an unnamed Middle Eastern investor.
News of the lawsuit has stoked media speculation that there could be a knock-on effect, with more lawsuits filed by angry investors and institutions against the large investment banks that securitised debts from the US subprime mortgage market but have since suffered enormous writedowns on those flawed investments. HSH says it invested $500 million in excess regulatory capital in the fund in question expecting secure returns. It accuses UBS of breaking contractual terms by making high-risk investments and taking out some investments solely for UBS' own benefit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in Trump’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs