Complex business practices open the door to fraud
Contradictions in managing financial data is opening the door to corporate fraud in the UK, says new survey.
LONDON – A new survey of more than 60 audit and financial executives in the UK and Germany has found that the complexity of today's business operations is opening the door to corporate fraud in the UK. It also highlights the fact that inherent contradictions in managing financial data create a confused environment where non-compliance and fraudulent activity can go unchecked and unnoticed.
Although more than 77% of respondents to the survey, conducted by ACL Service,s agreed a single view of all relevant financial data was vital to effectively meeting today's corporate governance requirements, less than a quarter of organisations have this complete picture – leaving many of the companies surveyed vulnerable to inefficiencies and fraud.
Despite this, however, 81% still felt confident about being able to meet financial compliance and governance obligations.
Further contradictions and challenges were highlighted in the survey. Some 84% of respondents agreed that continuously monitoring the internal controls of key business processes would ensure operational and financial integrity, but only 43% were planning to do so, or had deployed these techniques.
Some 57% currently perform financial audits either quarterly or annually, and only 27% say they would like to carry out audits more frequently (such as daily or weekly). This is despite an awareness of the benefits of reacting promptly when internal controls are not working as intended.
And of the companies surveyed, 42% do not know how long a suspect transaction outside internal control parameters could go unnoticed, and nearly one third believe an anomaly could go unnoticed for more than six months.
“These results illustrate the true complexity of managing financial data across organisations. While many financial professionals acknowledge the challenges, many appear unable to implement the organisational changes necessary - despite the clear business benefit,” says Liz Maloney, regional director of EMEA for ACL.
“The majority of executives surveyed believe they have effective processes in place, but by not continually monitoring their financial transactions, UK organisations are leaving themselves open to fraudulent activities and organisational inefficiencies that can severely affect the bottom line,” she adds.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive