Alternative investors favour external regulator, says PwC survey
The alternative investment industry is in favour of being externally regulated, according to poll conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers
A poll of almost 100 leading alternative investment industry professionals, conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers at one of its alternative investment seminars, found that nearly three-quarters –73% – of senior executives feel the alternative investment industry should be regulated more formally. More than half of these (42%) think the industry should be fully externally regulated, and 31% would prefer to see the industry self-governed. Only 27% believe it should remain the same.
Pars Purewal, alternative investment leader at PwC, says: “This points to a significant shift in sentiment from what we have heard historically in the market. For the first time a greater proportion of the industry would prefer to be externally regulated than self-governed.”
The poll also revealed that almost half of those surveyed (47%) would like the valuation process to be assessed independently and that the end valuation should be validated by a third party.
When asked whether investors are making greater demands in relation to the provision of information, 73% of voters noted it is increasing and 93% considered transparency, risk management and governance important to investors.
Purewal adds: “It is not surprising that, in these turbulent times, investors are demanding more from product providers. Investors want to know more about risk, valuation and generally they want more transparency. This is very consistent with the Global Alternatives Survey we released earlier this year. We expect investors to want more information in future and this poll reinforces this point.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Fireside chat: Advancing FX clearing for safer settlement
Developments in FX clearing are supporting the creation of a safer, more scalable settlement infrastructure
FHLB Cincinnati explores AI to spot failing banks
Agentic model detects anomalies, monitors sentiment and drafts credit reports for analyst review
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Most banks run physical climate scenarios beyond 2050
Risk Benchmarking data finds majority rely on geospatial asset mapping, while a third use third-party catastrophe models
Big banks love their climate vendors; small banks, not so much
Risk Benchmarking: Lenders with blue-chip loan books more likely to favour climate tools, research finds
Mob rule: populism’s rise pits banks against the people
Trump and fellow mavericks are reshaping politics, leaving banks scrambling to adjust to new and unpredictable risks
JSCC considers default fund consolidation
Japanese clearing house looks for efficiency gains amid expansion of clearing products and influx of international firms
EU clearing houses pressured to diversify cloud vendors
CROs and regulators see tech concentration risk as a barrier to operational resilience