Liberty fined $600,000 for AML breach
NEW YORK – US regulators imposed a $600,000 civil fine on the Manhattan-based Liberty Bank in mid-May. The bank, which focuses on Korean-American customers, was upbraided for violations of federal and state anti-money laundering laws in a statement issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the New York State Banking Department. Liberty did not admit wrongdoing.
Liberty itself is being acquired by Los Angles' Wilshire Bancorp – which also serves Korean-American customers – for $15.7 million of cash and stock. Final regulatory approval for the deal was received in April.
The regulators said Liberty Bank had failed to implement an adequate Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering programme, with internal controls and appropriate measures to detect and report money laundering and other suspicious activity in a timely manner. The regulators also found that systemic defects in Liberty Bank's anti-money laundering programme resulted in a failure to comply with information-sharing requests from law enforcement under section 314(a) of the USA Patriot Act.
"Today's action against Liberty Bank of New York is a great example of what can be accomplished when state and federal regulators share information," says Diana Taylor, New York state banking superintendent. "The memorandum of understanding signed by the banking department and FinCEN in April 2005 has greatly improved regulators' and law enforcements' ability to take action against institutions that violate the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants