Credit data: rising default risk for millennial companies
WeWork’s problems hint at the challenges facing companies focused on millennial customers
With its sleek aesthetics, fruit-water dispensers and free beer gimmick, WeWork seemed to perfectly capture the millennial zeitgeist. The co-working company catered to the army of entrepreneurs, start-ups and freelancers that define the gig economy. As millennials became the largest demographic in the workforce, WeWork expanded rapidly. In January 2019, an investment from Japan’s Softbank valued the company at $47 billion.
Then, everything came crashing down. WeWork pulled its planned initial public offering in September after investors questioned its business model and profitability. Almost overnight, its valuation dropped to under $8 billion. In October, Fitch downgraded WeWork’s credit rating to CCC+, deep in junk territory, with a negative outlook.
WeWork is an extreme example, but its problems could be a harbinger for other companies reliant on millennial customers. Comparing the credit performance of 57 such businesses to more traditional companies – including a subset of the S&P 500 – reveals a worrying trend. Since 2016, companies focused on millennials have seen their credit quality deteriorate by 24% compared with only 7% for the comparator group.
This shouldn’t be surprising. Companies have spent vast sums chasing millennial consumers. And although millennials have overtaken baby boomers as the largest population group in the US, their spending power still lags far behind older generations.
According to data from the US Federal Reserve, millennials under the age of 40 control just 6.7% of household wealth, compared with 45% for baby boomers aged between 55 and 69. Indeed, the wealth gap between younger and older generations has widened – 30 years ago, when baby boomers were roughly the same age as millennials are now, they accounted for 13.1% of household wealth.
Today, millennials are saddled with higher student debts and housing costs than previous generations, further reducing their disposable income. Many are also eschewing marriage and home-ownership, which have traditionally acted as catalysts for spending.
That could change in the next few years, as millennials pay off their debts and move into better-paying jobs. But for now, lenders should not turn a blind eye to the credit risk of companies touting their millennial bona fides.
Global credit industry trends
The latest consensus credit data shows that credit activity for corporates and financials has stayed stable, with 4.9% of entities moving by at least one notch, similar to last month. Figure 1 shows detailed industry migration trends for the most recent published data, adjusted for changes in contributor mix.
Figure 1 shows:
- Globally, corporate downgrades outnumber upgrades.
- Upgrades outnumber downgrades in one of the nine industries, six industries are biased towards downgrades and two are in balance.
- Industrials have more downgrades than upgrades for the fourth month.
- Consumer goods and technology continue to see downgrades outweighing upgrades for the third month.
- Basic materials have more downgrades than upgrades for the second month.
- Telecommunications see downgrades outweighing upgrades after two months of upgrades dominating.
- Oil and gas shows volatility, and currently have more downgrades than upgrades.
- Utilities see upgrades outnumber downgrades after two months of balance.
- Consumer services is in balance after a month of downgrades dominating.
- Healthcare is in balance for the second month.
Indian financials
India may be the fifth-largest economy in the world, but it faces significant economic headwinds. Indian lenders are stymied by bad debt – a non—performing loan ratio of 9.3% of total lending ranks India the worst among the top 10 economies – and a large percentage of Indian citizens have limited access to formal banking services. This systemic fragility may account for the credit performance of Indian financials, which have seen a sustained credit quality deterioration.
Figure 2 shows the monthly changes in credit risk of 90 Indian financials.
Figure 2 shows:
- Since January 2016, the credit risk of Indian financials shows 27 months of deterioration versus 17 months of improvement.
- Latest data shows four months of consecutive deteriorations.
- Indian financials are mainly centred about bbb/bb, with no entities in the highest and lowest categories.
Millennial companies
The millennial consumer is still something of an enigma to the corporate world, but most businesses agree on the importance of capturing a market share of a generation that will account for three-quarters of the US workforce by 2030. But are millennial-focused companies a good credit prospect? Credit Benchmark has created an index of US- and UK-based businesses that cater to youthful consumers.
Figure 3 shows the credit trend of 57 millennial-friendly companies and a traditional comparator, which includes a subset of companies from the S&P 500.
Figure 3 shows:
- Both millennial-friendly and traditional companies have seen deterioration in the past two to three years.
- The millennial-focused group has seen a much deeper drop, 24% vs 7% at their respective lows.
- Both sets of companies improved in credit risk from December 2018, although the latest month shows a dip in credit quality.
Automobiles and parts
Consensus risk data shows credit risk levels increasing for UK and US automobiles and parts companies. The sector is particularly exposed to the impact of global supply chain challenges and environmental changes. In addition, rising auto loan delinquencies suggest that demand may stagnate in coming months.
Figure 4 shows the credit trend and distributions since January 2017 for 110 US and 130 UK automobiles and parts companies.
Figure 4 shows:
- Both US and UK automobiles and parts credit risk saw a general trend of improvement throughout 2017.
- UK companies were the first to start deteriorating in February 2018. US automobiles and parts continued to improve, but showed signs of stabilisation a quarter later.
- The credit risk of US automobiles and parts started to deteriorate more sharply from the beginning of 2019, with credit risk increasing by 7% since January 2019.
- The majority of US automobiles and parts are in investment-grade category bbb – in comparison more than 50% of UK companies in the sector are in non-investment-grade bb.
Public v private leverage loan issuers
The value of leveraged loans issuance has more than doubled in recent years, from $600 billion in 2012 to $1.4 billion in 2018. This jump implies strong demand by investors for leveraged loans, despite the fact that a significant number of higher-risk “covenant-lite” loans have featured in a number of leveraged loan issues.
Figure 5 shows credit levels since January 2018 for two groups of leverage loan issuers: 134 publicly listed companies and 63 private equity-owned firms.
Figure 5 shows:
- In the latest month, the average probability of default (PD) of private equity-owned leveraged loan issuers is 618 basis points which corresponds to a consensus rating of b.
- In comparison, publicly listed firms have an average PD of 232bp, corresponding to a consensus rating of bb–, two ratings better than the private equity counterparts.
- Private equity-owned issuer credit risk has deteriorated by 18% since the low of October 2018; while public companies have only seen a rise in default risk of 5% over the same period.
About this data
Credit Benchmark collects monthly credit risk inputs from 40-plus of the world’s leading financial institutions, making it possible to follow credit trends across geographies and industries. In all, the dataset contains consensus ratings on about 50,000 rated and unrated entities globally.
David Carruthers is head of research at Credit Benchmark.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら コメント
市場は決して忘れない:平方根則の持続的な影響
ジャン=フィリップ・ブショー氏はトレードの流れは資産価格に大きく、かつ長期的な影響があると主張する。
ポッドキャスト:ピエトロ・ロッシ氏による信用格付けとボラティリティ・モデルについて
確率論的手法とキャリブレーション速度の向上により、クレジットおよび株式分野における確立されたモデルが改善されます。
オペリスクデータ:カイザー社、病気の偽装により5億ドルの支払いを主導
また:融資不正取引が韓国系銀行を直撃;サクソバンクとサンタンデール銀行でAMLが機能せず。ORXニュースのデータより
大げさな宣伝を超えて、トークン化は基盤構造を改善することができる
デジタル専門家によれば、ブロックチェーン技術は流動性の低い資産に対して、より効率的で低コストな運用手段を提供します。
GenAIガバナンスにおけるモデル検証の再考
米国のモデルリスク責任者が、銀行が既存の監督基準を再調整する方法について概説します。
マルキールのサル:運用者の能力を測る、より優れたベンチマーク
iM Global Partnersのリュック・デュモンティエ氏とジョアン・セルファティ氏は、ある有名な実験が、株式選定者のパフォーマンスを評価する別の方法を示唆していると述べています。
IMAの現状:大きな期待と現実の対峙
最新のトレーディングブック規制は内部モデル手法を改定しましたが、大半の銀行は適用除外を選択しています。二人のリスク専門家がその理由を探ります。
地政学的リスクがどのようにシステム的なストレステストへと変化したのか
資源をめぐる争いは、時折発生するリスクプレミアムを超えた形で市場を再構築しています。