Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2019
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, featuring a ranking of the top 15 schools
Welcome to Risk.net’s updated guide to the world’s leading quantitative finance master’s programmes – featuring, for the first time, a ranking of the top 15 courses, the first global ranking of its kind.
Risk.net considered metrics including graduate salaries, programme selectivity, student-lecturer contact hours and faculty research scores to run the rule over more than 40 leading quantitative finance-focused master’s programmes worldwide. Particular weight was given to average graduate salaries and a strong employment rate – scroll down for further details.
Several programmes – including the Illinois Institute of Technology, St Gallen and UCLA’s Anderson School of Management – are featured for the first time this year; their entries include profiles based on interviews with course directors and alumni. Programmes featured in the 2017 edition of the guide have had their statistics updated for the 2017–18 academic year; their profiles from the previous edition of the guide are linked to at the foot of each article. Programmes which failed to provide updated statistics were not included in the 2019 edition.
This guide covers only master’s programmes in which the teaching of quantitative finance is central. Programmes whose focus is on other subjects (eg, corporate finance, management or statistics), though featuring quantitative finance courses, have not been considered here.
As previously, collecting data has been facilitated by the helpfulness of faculty administrators and programme directors, for which we are grateful. The list of programmes may be non-exhaustive. Risk.net bears no responsibility for exceptions, oversights or omissions. We will gladly consider all and any feedback in this regard.
The guide should not be relied on for advice – but as before, we hope it proves helpful to would-be master’s students, their teachers, and their future employers.
Click on universities in the table below for full course details. If the table is not displaying properly, click here for a pop-out version
Research and profiles: Jamie Ryder. Ranking methodology: Mauro Cesa. Editing by Alex Krohn and Tom Osborn.
Ranking methodology
To compile the ranking of the top 15 programmes, we considered eight metrics. These have been standardised with respect to the total pool of entries, and a weight has been assigned to each to reflect their contribution to the final score. The total score is the sum of the eight standardised metrics. The institution with the highest score takes the top position in the ranking.
Some weights, such as a programme’s acceptance rate – an indicator the selectivity of a programme – contribute negatively to the final score (ie, the lower the metric, the more selective the school).
The eight variables and the respective weights are:
5% – Number of students;
10% – Acceptance rate;
15% – Percentage of students accepting their offer;
5% – Ratio between number of students and number of lecturers;
5% – Number of industry-affiliated lecturers;
25% – Employment rate in finance sector six months after graduation;
10% – Number of citations of the five most cited lecturers in academic journals in the past four years
25% – Average salary six months after graduation, adjusted for the purchasing power parity conversion factor provided by the World Bank.
In order for an institution to be considered for this ranking, it needed to provide sufficient data for the calculation of the final score. Institutions who submitted insufficient data have not been considered.
Not all institutions provided the number of citations of their lecturers. We filled those gaps using the figures available on Google Scholar. Where that was not possible, we considered the number of citations as zero.
The ranking, as well as the guide, rely on the figures provided by the institutions to be accurate. Risk.net bears no responsibility for any inaccurate metrics, or their impact on a university’s position in the guide.
Americas
Baruch College, City University of New York
Boston University
University of California, Berkeley (Haas School of Business)
University of California, Los Angeles (Anderson School of Management)
Carnegie Mellon University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
Cornell University
Fordham University (Gabelli School of Business)
Illinois Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
New York University (Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences)
New York University (Tandon School of Engineering)
North Carolina State University
Princeton University
Rutgers University
Stony Brook University
University of Washington
University of Toronto
University of Waterloo
Europe
City, University of London (Bayes Business School, formerly Cass Business School)
Imperial College London
Imperial College Business School
King’s College London
University College London
University of Oxford
University of Warwick
University of York
EPFL
ETH Zurich/University of Zurich
University of St Gallen
EISTI
Paris Diderot University
University of Bologna
University of Florence
University of Amsterdam
Erasmus University Rotterdam
WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business)
University of Leuven
Asia-Pacific
Monash University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら リスク管理
CMEは、2027年に内部で顧客向けに米国国債のクロス・マージニングを提供することを目指している
CCPはSECに初期提案を提出しました。共同FICCプログラムよりも幅広い商品を提供したいとしています。
マヌエラ・ヴェローゾ氏が語る、銀行がAIのビジョンを現実のものにする方法
JPモルガンの元AI研究責任者は、自由な探究こそが技術の真の可能性を引き出すと述べています
ECBの地政学的ストレステストにはコストが伴う
ある学者は、地政学的リスク事象による損失を補償するための保険料がいくらになるべきかについては、市場だけが判断できるものであり、現時点ではそのような市場は存在しないと主張しています。
リスク管理担当者は、イントラデイ・レポ取引に伴うリスクとメリットに頭を悩ませている
担保の流通速度の上昇や再利用の増加が見込まれることも、市場におけるレバレッジやリスクを高める可能性があります
レポ・トークンは清算されない...のか?
トークン化された米国債の清算状況については依然として不透明感が残っており、決定はDTCCに委ねられる見通しです
オペリスク・データ:日本のレストラン向け決済企業が7億ドルの損失を計上
また、バローダ銀行の詐欺事件の提訴、ウェルズ・ファーゴのポンジ・スキーム問題、そしてスウェドバンクのパナマ文書関連の賠償金支払いについても取り上げます。データ提供:ORX News
ECB、地政学的ストレステストの枠組みに不備を指摘
現在の手法では、地政学的緊張が流動性に及ぼす影響を適切に把握できていません
内部報告データがガバナンスとリスク管理をいかにして強化できるか
日本の改正された内部通報制度は、社内通報体制を強化する機会となります