Back to the floor

Operational risk

oprisk-home-gif

The latest musings from the Switzerland-based Basel Committee on Banking Supervision have Australia’s risk management executives scratching their heads. At first glance, the decision to scrap contentious proposals for a 75% operational risk capital floor appears to be a positive step for Australia’s four major banks, all of which are eyeing the more sophisticated advanced measurement approach (AMA). But new measures to introduce a combined floor for credit and operational risk have

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here