
EU compounding confusion creates headaches for banks
With the fallback possibly illegal in some EU states, loan system updates may become more complicated
Imagine asking the smartest people you can find to build the perfect solution to a big industry problem. They do a good job and everyone thinks the solution will work.
But when it’s on the verge of rollout, pesky lawyers pop up and point out that, in fact, it might be illegal.
This is what happened in December, when it emerged that the proposed fallback rates for Euribor may be banned from use in Germany and Italy.
Regulators in Europe, as in other jurisdictions, are pushing market participants to adopt so-called fallback language that will switch existing swaps contracts to a backup rate if Euribor ends.
The fallbacks haven’t been finalised yet. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association is consulting on backup rates for swaps. If Europe follows other jurisdictions, the backup rate for Euribor would be based on a backward-looking compounded version of the euro short-term rate, plus a spread on top representing the historical difference between €STR and Euribor.
Confusingly, the euro working group is also consulting on fallbacks for Euribor-linked swaps, alongside bonds and loans, and may recommend forward-looking fallbacks based on futures and overnight indexed swap quotes.
Some European regulatory sources are privately sceptical of forward-looking rates, which can be based on quotes and seem too close to the old Libor setup
But some European regulatory sources are privately sceptical of forward-looking rates, which can be based on quotes and seem too close to the old Libor setup. So a backward-looking compounded fallback appears to be the most likely choice.
This is a problem in Italy and Germany, however, where compounded interest is explicitly banned under local law.
While fallbacks based on compounded interest have been on the menu for some time, lawyers have only recently pointed this out. A senior figure involved in the development of the fallbacks was not aware of the issue when approached by Risk.net.
The problem was raised for the first time at a December 4 meeting of the working group on euro risk-free rates.The minutes of the meeting also highlighted new concerns with the European Mortgage Credit Directive, which can be read as requiring borrowers to be informed of a change in interest rate before it takes effect. This means consent may be required before the fallback kicks in.
The exact requirements vary across jurisdictions, and some countries may also bar a change in interest rate under consumer protection laws.
The Loan Market Association’s Kam Mahil stressed the urgency of the situation at the meeting, calling for a Europe-wide analysis of the legality of compounding methodologies in each member state.
With any project as large as this, some problems inevitably crop up late in the day. And with Euribor not ending anytime soon, the industry has time to find a fix.
But as Mahil points out, the US and UK are opting for compounded rates. Ideally, Europe will follow suit so the industry can develop loan systems that will deal with the problem globally.
But with the US dollar and sterling Libor rates potentially going away at the end of 2021, global banks will have to make a start on updating their loan systems relatively soon. The biggest firms won’t have the luxury of waiting around to see how Europe deals with the legality of compounded interest.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
In bank runs and market crashes, it matters how ideas ‘catch’
Contagion episodes show importance of network effects in finance
Hear no EVE, see no EVE
The Fed chastised SVB for poor rate-risk monitoring, but most US banks’ disclosures remain focused on earnings alone
Challenged single-name CDS market takes optimistic turn
Trading has boomed despite recent criticism, but can the market regain its former strength?
How banks can avoid bad haircuts on hedge fund trades
HSBC quant makes case for looking at collateral and funding rates in concert
The Catch-22 of US banks’ liquidity buffers
US banks are using held-to-maturity bonds to underpin liquidity adequacy, grating against accounting guidance. What happens if they’re forced to sell?
After a hack, loose lips won’t sink chips
Ion Group is the latest ransomware victim to stay mum about how it was compromised. No-one benefits from this code of silence
Taking the measure of CMS pricing
Bank of America quants propose comprehensive framework for modelling rate derivatives
Inflationary forces (and microbial soups)
The hold of central banks over inflation may be weaker than we thought