Clearing house’s sponsored programme claimed $449.7 billion of US Treasury-backed trades
The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) was counterparty to $449.7 billion of US Treasury repos with money market funds (MMFs) over the course of Q2 2019, 20.4% of the total. The year-ago quarter, its total trade volume was $120.6 billion (6.6%) and just $5 billion (0.3%) in Q2 2017.
The Federal Reserve was party to just 2% of all trades in Q2 2019, compared with 6.8% a year ago and down from a peak of 62.7% in Q1 2015.
US Treasury repos with MMFs totalled $2.2 trillion over Q2, up 14.6% on the previous quarter and 20.9% on Q2 2018.
Royal Bank of Canada claimed the largest share of US government agency security repos with MMFs in Q2, conducting $169.1 billion, 13% of the total. This was flat on its year-ago quarter share. Funds managed by Fidelity were its largest counterparty, accounting for $42.8 billion of trades.
JP Morgan accounted for a 10.2% share, up from 5.1% a year prior, and BNP Paribas 8.7%, up from 8.2%. Their largest counterparties were funds run by Fidelity and JP Morgan, respectively.
US agency security repos with MMFs totalled $1.3 trillion over Q2, up 3.6% on the previous quarter and 23.2% the year-ago quarter.
In other repos, trades backed by collateral other than US Treasuries or agency debt, Wells Fargo dominated. The bank conducted $21.8 billion of trades, 16.2% of the total, up from 8.3% the year-ago quarter. Funds managed by Fidelity accounted for $4.4 billion of these.
Societe Generale accounted for 11.9%, down from 12.6% and BNP Paribas 10.9%, down from 12.3%. Their largest counterparties were funds run by JP Morgan and Schwab, respectively.
Total other repo trades with MMFs amounted to $134.8 billion, up 13.4% on Q1 2019 and 22.6% on the year-ago quarter.
What is it?
The US Office of Financial Research tracks MMFs investment portfolios by asset type, country and counterparty, among others.
The repo data is aggregated and mapped by the OFR from monthly schedules of MMF portfolio holdings filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, known as Form N-MFP2s.
Why it matters
FICC’s entry into the US Treasury repo trade has been a game-changer. In May 2017, the firm began allowing banks to sponsor MMFs and buy-side participants onto its cleared repo platform.
FICC listed 1,769 sponsored members as of July 11. Why have they flocked to the platform? Simple – cleared repo trades can generate higher returns for MMFs.
Cleared repos also offer relief to banks, as bunching trades with FICC allows them to net down offsetting positions, reducing their balance sheet consumption and associated capital requirements.
This frees banks to devote more balance sheet to less conventional forms of repo using different collateral types, which can yield higher returns.
Correction, October 24 2019: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the total amount of other repo trades for Q2 as $1.3 trillion
Get in touch
Like Risk Quantum? Sign up for free to our daily newsletter and check @RiskQuantum for the latest updates.
If you have any thoughts on our latest analysis or want to suggest other ways to present and analyse the data, you can email us.
Tell me more
FICC takes firm grip of US repo market
Goldman and Federated first to clear MMF repo trades
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Six US G-Sibs face higher surcharges under Fed’s proposals
Goldman and BNY Mellon only top banks to escape increase, analysis shows
LME had four-hour operational failure in Q4
First outage on record caused by connectivity issue at LMEmercury
Goldman faces higher 3.5% G-Sib surcharge in 2026
50bp step up in capital add-on looms after dealer’s systemic footprint rose to a record high in 2023
NSCC issued record $45bn cash call in Q4
Worst-case scenario estimate up 22% from previous quarter
Canada’s top dealers boost derivatives clearing as FRTB kicks in
BMO, RBC and TD Bank cleared record C$45.1 trillion in notionals in Q1
SVAR updates push Barclays’ modelled market charges up 9%
Trading portfolio regulatory risk gauge up 52% over the second half of 2023
US FCMs far apart on target residual interest levels
Dealers diverge widely in how much capital they deem necessary to cover customer fund shortfalls
Euro area funds’ debt securities surged 13% in 2023
Investments vis-a-vis euro area issuers rebound after 2022 slump, driven by bond funds
Most read
- Quants are using language models to map what causes what
- Reluctantly, CME moves to clear US Treasuries
- The bank quant who wants to stop gen AI hallucinating