Skip to main content

Clearing banks pick holes in VAR-based CCP margin models

New models ease cliff effects, but banks say they are less predictable and prone to undershooting

Chart data on a digital tablet

Executives at two large clearing banks have joined the chorus of voices complaining about the difficulty of predicting and explaining the outputs of value-at-risk models used by central counterparties (CCPs). 

The move to VAR has made margin modelling “much more complicated”, said Amy Elliott, Americas head of exchange-traded derivatives at UBS: “It’s less transparent, so when you have periods of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here