Skip to main content

Don’t mind the gap risk: regulatory treatment of credit repacks

Gap risk in repackaging is not a credit valuation adjustment for Basel III capital purposes, argues senior quant Andrey Chirikhin

Top view of passenger’s feet standing in front of painted yellow box and directional arrows on a train station floor

Credit repackaging deals – or credit repacks – have become popular yield enhancement products for investors. The essential part of valuing these deals is computing the embedded gap risk.

Because valuing gap risk is akin to computing a credit valuation adjustment (CVA), the industry has been questioning, in light of Basel III, whether gap risk is indeed CVA, and therefore what its regulatory

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here