Risk weight tweak could fix IFRS 9 capital clash – research

Practitioner suggests way to cancel out double-counting of Basel credit loss provisions


The shift to expected credit loss accounting has caused banks to complain they must set aside too much capital for credit losses owing to a discrepancy between the new rules and the Basel capital regime – but new research suggests a way of adjusting risk weights in advanced models to help resolve the clash.

The IFRS 9 accounting standards force lenders to hold provisions for expected credit losses across the lifetime of some assets, whereas firms using the advanced modelling approach use a more

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: