Skip to main content

Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait

Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs

Exam papers fly randomly in front of a backdrop of the strait of hormuz

When the war in Iran and closure of the Strait of Hormuz raised the threat of a global energy shock in late February, officials at the European Central Bank’s single supervisory mechanism (SSM) felt vindicated. Just under three months earlier, they had asked the 110 banks the SSM directly supervises to carry out a reverse stress test specifically around geopolitical risk. 

The test required the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here