Three lines of defence a struggle, say op risk heads

Separation "theoretically perfect" but "practically, hugely flawed" says UBS's Hunt

Three lines of defence
Three lines of defence: flawed in practice

Most large financial firms employ the 'three lines of defence' model for operational risk management, but the model is confusing for risk managers at best and counterproductive at worst, delegates at OpRisk Europe heard on June 14 and 15.

Sam Lee, head of operational risk for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, said the standard model had actually held some firms back from embedding operational risk frameworks. Specifically, he said the efforts of some

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: