Group allocation conflicts heat up
London and Nice -– Regulators and the financial services industry are already starting to point fingers at each other over the problem of allocating op risk capital for banking groups across borders. For example, tempers are particularly flaring in Europe, where the about-to-be released Capital Adequacy Directive will have text outlining how regulators in the EU will co-ordinate. But bankers are already predicting that supervisors will not be able to implement a home-host framework. And indeed, the first cracks in the European regulators’ front are beginning to appear, with the non-EU Swiss refusing to allow top-down allocation mechanisms for the advanced measurement approach (AMA) for banks.
According to Michel Martino, an official in the European Commission’s Banking and Financial Conglomerate’s unit, the forthcoming CAD text will outline the EU’s group allocation strategy. Martino, speaking at a conference in London in early July, said each firm in the EU will have a single lead regulator, who will head up a “college of regulators” of EU host supervisors. A single
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC
Op risk data: Japanese restaurant payments firm swallows $700m loss
Also: Bank of Baroda fraud filing, Wells’ Ponzi woes, and Swedbank’s Panama Papers payout. Data by ORX News
ECB finds gaps in geopolitical stress-testing frameworks
Current methods fail to properly capture impact of geopolitical stress on liquidity
How internal reporting data can strengthen governance and risk oversight
Japan’s revised whistleblower regime provides an opportunity to strengthen internal reporting arrangements