The case for modularity and interoperability
Key findings:
- Optimised: almost half (47%) of respondents believe their entire trade lifecycle to be significantly optimised (automated, transparent and auditable), while just under one-third (30%) reported that parts of their trade lifecycle are automated, although they have no plans right now to improve their levels of automation.
- Front-office systems: 43% of respondents reported having a single, integrated multi-asset trading platform (albeit with limitations), while 27% have deployed modular trading platforms.
- Greatest challenges relating to their trading technology: 40% of respondents cited their systems’ inability to add support for new markets/instruments, while 30% cited a user interface that lacks integration, intuitiveness and configurability.
Download the whitepaper
Register for free access to hundreds of resources.
More related resources
Rethinking FX sales – unlocking margin and client value through modern technology
Understand why legacy FX sales tools have become a commercial liability and how modern, human-centred platforms can improve productivity, reduce risk and enhance client outcomes
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs: rethinking the buy-side front-office tech stack
Identifying the right solutions for buy-side firms’ business objectives, the benefits of improved workflow efficiency and tailoring solutions to business priorities and ambitions
Technology risk management: a proactive framework for the digital age
Firms must adopt more proactive and integrated technology risk management frameworks
Big book of models: the ultimate guide to analytical models for smarter business decisions
A practical guide for professionals in risk management and quantitative analysis, helping practitioners choose the right methodologies for effective decision-making
The shift to real-time in treasury and capital markets
The transition to real-time processing is under way in treasury departments
