Regulators split on implementation of Mifid swaps transparency

Esma and FCA divided over when participants must determine whether derivatives are trading on-venue

Opposing views: the dispute could further delay bank implementation efforts for Mifid II

European Union regulators are split on the point at which over-the-counter derivatives are considered to be traded or admitted to trade on a venue – essential in determining whether an instrument is subject to upcoming pre- and post-trade transparency requirements. The dispute could further delay bank implementation efforts for the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II), with just five months until the new rules take effect.

“There isn’t enough clarity in the Mifid II text

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: