Banks claim front-office content is safe from Mifid II

Work of ‘desk analysts’ is not research, banks argue; lawyers are not so sure

Need a workaround?
A surmountable obstacle? Lawyers remain unconvinced of the validity of any workaround

Dealers are seeking to create a firewall around the content produced within their sales and trading businesses, to protect it from incoming European rules that require research to be paid for separately. The argument is that this material – such as commentary on market flows, proprietary data, or trade ideas – is distinct from research in a variety of ways.

Some lawyers are not convinced this stance complies with the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II).

“That sounds

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: