EU net margin rules are riskier than US regime, warns CFTC

Commission’s Bandman raises margin financing as emerging systemic risk to CCPs

Poor fit: the differing margin regimes of the CFTC and EC have caused problems

The European Union's net margin clearing regime provides fewer systemic safeguards during the default of a buy-side client at a central counterparty (CCP) compared with a gross margining approach, claims a leading US regulator – provoking an emphatic rebuttal from European clearing banks.

"For futures trading in the US, we require gross margining where the clearing house requires the clearing members to pass on customer collateral so the funds are actually available to the CCP. For futures

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here