New trading book QIS tackles correlation gripes

Changes proposed for correlation, exotic derivatives and hard-to-model risks

photo of the basel committee headquarters
Basel Committee headquarters

Regulators may have swapped a capital burden for a computational one in their latest attempts to standardise the treatment of correlation in trading portfolios.

Existing proposals assumed correlation was higher for risk-additive positions and lower for offsetting ones, magnifying a bank's exposure in the first scenario and limiting netting benefits in the second. This asymmetry has now been removed – a key demand of industry critics during the third quantitative impact study (QIS) on the rules

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here