Basel trading book review triggers fight for modelling freedom

Peter Sime

A senior risk manager at a US bank recalls the first time regulators and industry representatives met, in November 2010, to sketch out a replacement for Basel 2.5 and its modular approach to trading book capital requirements. His early enthusiasm did not last long.

“We were so excited. We were going to rationalise everything, get rid of this patchwork of measures, do things properly. When we got in there we were quickly set straight. The regulators had a completely different agenda – it wasn’t

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: