The impact of Basel III on systemic risk and counterparty risk

Market analysis: Basel III

bis-tower-basel
The BIS tower in Basel, home to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

One of the key shortcomings of the first two Basel Accords was that they approached the solvency of each institution independently. The recent financial crisis highlighted the additional systemic risk that the failure of one large institution could cause the failure of one or more of its counterparties, which could then trigger a chain reaction.

Basel III addresses this issue in two ways: firstly by significantly increasing capital buffers for risks related to the interconnectedness of the major

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: