Substantial flaws remain in Basel II, says CSFB's Ervin
Wilson Ervin, head of the strategic risk management department at Credit Suisse First Boston, yesterday said that there are causes for concern in the Basel II proposals. "While there is much to admire in the new [Basel II] rules, there are also many elements that raise serious concern," said Ervin who spoke on behalf of trade group, the Financial Services Roundtable, at congressional hearings in Washington DC yesterday.
Ervin raised four “macro” criticisms of the proposed Basel II rules. First, he said the new rules were “too complex, too costly, and too inflexible to provide a robust, durable framework for bank supervision going forward”. He warned that a side-effect of the proposals could be the “effect of freezing the development of good risk management, and locking it into an ‘early 2000’s’ mindset”. The hearings were before the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade, and Technology of the Financial Services Committee, in the US House of Representatives. Second, Ervin said that the new Accord’s sensitivity to credit ratings will reduce liquidity in the markets during economic downturns — the so-called procyclical effect.Third, Ervin sharply criticised the operational risk charge proposed by the revisions, calling it “a fundamentally flawed concept — it is built on sand, not a solid foundation — and could actually distract from good risk management.” Last, he criticised the increased disclosure that the new Accord proposals will require under Pillar III. He said these rules “are likely to add at least 20 pages of highly technical disclosure to bank annual reports, raising costs and providing little or no information of value to the reader”.
In raising the last point, Ervin noted that as a Swiss bank, CSFB will be regulated by Swiss authorities, as well as regulators in the UK and the US. He said, “This interlocking patchwork of regulation can pose significant challenges…we have been required to implement conflicting risk calculations by different regulators, making compliance a difficult ‘Catch-22’. He noted that co-ordination of regulators will be an issue of growing importance in the coming months.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
- Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high