
EU Cad 3 paper delayed to mid-November
The commission, the ruling body of the European Union (EU), wants to apply Cad 3 from the same date to all banks and investment firms in the EU, which by then could comprise 25 member countries compared with the present 15.
The Cad 3 working paper will be a follow-up to the overview of progress with Basel II issued this month by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II and the body that effectively regulates international banking. The slippage in publishing schedule for the Cad 3 paper does not reflect any disagreements among the experts drawing it up, officials claimed.
Cad 3, like Basel II, will determine how much protective capital banks must set aside as a cushion to absorb unexpected losses from banking risks, including credit, market and operational risks.
The Cad 3 paper will give banks and investment firms an idea of how the directive will look on the assumption that the final version of Basel II will be very like the shape indicated in the third quantitative impact study, or QIS 3, also issued this month.
QIS 3 seeks information from 265 banks in some 50 countries on how Basel II might affect them.
The commission said in July that it was considering how best to modify the Basel II operational risk proposals as they apply to EU investment firms. The commission believes for certain types of lower-risk investment firms, the Basel II op risk capital charges would be disproportionate to the risks faced by those firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US