Asia bankers reject counter-cyclical capital buffer as effective tool for supervision

Counter accusations

BIS Tower: the focus of Asian frustration over the CCB

The principle behind Basel III’s counter-cyclical capital buffer (CCB) is simple: credit grew at too rapid a pace in the run-up to the financial crisis, so the Basel rules include a provision requiring banks to put in an additional capital buffer in economic boom times. Based on factors such as the credit-to-GDP ratio the CCB is intended to give regulators a weapon against pro-cyclicality and a defence against system-wide shocks.

But as with other aspects of the Basel Accord – most notably

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here