Editor’s letter
Paul Lyon paul.lyon@incisivemedia.com +44 (0)20 7484 9802
One leading distributor of structured products for the Italian retail market last month complained to me that increased scrutiny of new products by the Bank of Italy has slowed down the approval process considerably. “Product approval now takes up to twice as long in a post-Parmalat world. And we sometimes only get that approval the day before we are set to launch,” he said. “Of course, we observe the letter of the law, but lengthy waits can prove to be tedious.”
That same distributor also pointed out that regulatory requirements to provide investors with mountains of information may not be the best way to promote transparency. Instead, product specification details should be condensed to provide a more easily digestible overview, he said.
But some new regulation could prove to be more than welcome. As we report in our cover story, the European Union’s ‘Prospectus Directive’ rules, which come into force next year, could be a boon for the banks that structure investment products. The EU plans to create a single pan-European level playing field for financial products, effectively liberalising the selling of structured products in retail markets across the region.
It will be interesting to see if the rules really lead to true liberalisation. So far, opinions are divided. Dealers that structure products say most northern European countries, such as Luxembourg, Austria and the Netherlands, already uphold the principal of mutual recognition of products. It is those in the south, in countries like Italy and Spain, where they say state-level rules currently get in the way of a single market for structured products.
And as Javier Ruiz del Pozo, Madrid-based deputy director of primary markets at Spain’s securities market regulator the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, warns – “major problems could arise”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails
For Esma the supervisor, people power will be prime
Industry hopes to avoid people risk during transition, with help from national authorities
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules