Editor’s letter
opinion
Prior to British Energy’s annual general meeting in early August, a succession of newspaper articles appeared suggesting that bondholders had succeeded in pulling a fast one on the poor patriotic retail stock investors. The Daily Telegraph’s City column wrote: “[Shareholders] have the uneasy feeling that their company has been stolen from them, to the benefit of the moneylenders.”
Credit would like to publish the letter sent to The Daily Telegraph in response.
Sir, by your own admission when British Energy negotiated its debt restructuring “nuclear electricity cost more to generate than it fetched in the market”. As a result, shareholders could have subsidised the company themselves or handed it over to the creditors – they chose the latter. The situation is the same as negative equity: shareholders owned a house which was worth considerably less than their mortgage. Rather than bother paying off an expensive mortgage on a cheap house they defaulted and handed the house over to the bank.
But, in the past 11 months the price of electricity has risen and now “shareholders ... have the uneasy feeling that their company has been stolen from them.” What? Eleven months ago the shareholders decided to hand over the keys to what was, back then, a worthless property – it wasn’t just next to Sizewell, it was Sizewell.
You are now suggesting that the shareholders should ask for their house back. But you fail to appreciate that they have not been “existing shareholders” since this plan was agreed 11 months ago.
The Daily Telegraph replied:
Sir, not quite, I think. If shareholder approval was one of the conditions of the deal, then it’s not done until that condition is satisfied. If the BE board (suitably incentivised) uses delisting to get round that condition, I think it’s fair to say the shareholders are being robbed. This deal gives your readers a windfall they neither expected nor deserve.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks will not be frowned upon for discount window borrowing – Fed official
Risk Live: more banks have completed paperwork to access Fed lending facility than a year ago
Capital One puts OCC’s tough stance on mergers to the test
Proposed Discover deal should be approved but will go under the microscope, ex-regulators say
As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
Panellists highlight dangers of clearing membership becoming more concentrated
EU banks fear green asset ratios paint an unfair picture
Industry lobbyist clashes with lawmaker over usefulness of new sustainability disclosure
EU watchdogs to launch prop trader capital review in April
Prop traders say bank-style IFR rules are driving them out, but doubt EBA will suggest changes
Investors say new SEC disclosures may sit on shelf
Advisory committee questions value of rule 605 changes, even for retail investors
CFTC hears ‘call to action’ from swaps end-users on Basel III
Commissioner Pham mulls engaging with prudential regulators over capital hit on clearing
Iosco gears up for ‘intensive work’ on AI regulation
Watchdogs risk ‘falling behind the curve’, secretary-general warns; FSB also working on guidance
Most read
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high