CEBS: bank disclosures lack detail
The level of disclosure in the 2008 annual reports of major banks was better than the preceding year, but there is still much room for improvement, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) said on May 28.
In a public hearing held in London, Cebs laid out its findings from an assessment of the reports of 17 major banks, three of which were US firms. It concluded that, while "some tangible improvements compared with the previous year have been noted, the observation does not fit for all financial institutions as the level of disclosures appear rather heterogeneous".
Disclosures in certain sections of banks' reports were considered "too generic" and "may justify further attention". By way of example, Cebs said banks were not providing enough details of the methods they use to calculate gains on their own credit risk. While some banks recorded large one-off gains in the first quarter due to spreads widening on holdings of their own debt - reversing substantial Q4 losses - Cebs noted only one firm explained these gains would reverse if the market picked up.
Other areas where greater disclosure is needed include mark-to-model valuations, impairment of assets at goodwill, more granular information on guarantors, such as credit derivatives product companies, and liquidity risk.
Furthermore, although banks provided detailed information regarding their exposures, the assumptions and quantitative models used to value instruments such as collateralised debt obligations, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities tend not to be described in sufficient detail.
Cebs concluded that many banks tried to avoid disclosing quantitative methodology and assumptions by saying the information was confidential.
Following its assessment and comments made on Wednesday by market participants, Cebs intends to prepare a report on disclosure and release it for public consultation at the end of June.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision